Comparison of impulse oscillometry indices and FEV1 during methacholine challenge and bronchodilation tests

<bold>Background:</bold> Spirometry is the most used technique in methacholine challenge test (MCT) and bronchodilation test (BDT), however impulse oscillometry (IOS) could also be used as an alternative method. <bold>Objective:</bold> To demonstrate that IOS can be a reliable alternative to spirometry in MCT and BDT. <bold>Methods:</bold> Study included 20 subjects with suspected asthma (12 males, 8 females, mean age 41.5 ± 15.1). All participants underwent MCT using dosimeter (ProvoX, Ganshorn, Germany). FEV<sub>1</sub> (Spiroscout, Ganshorn, Germany) and IOS (Tremoflo C-100, Thorasys, Canada) parameters – airway resistance at 5 Hz (R<sub>5</sub>), 20 Hz (R<sub>20</sub>), 5–20 Hz (R<sub>5-20</sub>), reactance at 5 Hz (X<sub>5</sub>), reactance area at 5 Hz (AX<sub>5</sub>) were recorded at the beginning of the test and after each methacholine dose. In subjects for whom MCT was positive, bronchodilation using salbutamol was performed and FEV<sub>1</sub> and IOS indices were re-recorded. <bold>Results:</bold> At baseline and after the last methacholine dose a significant correlation was observed between FEV<sub>1</sub> and all IOS indices <italic>(p < 0.05)</italic>, except R<sub>5-20</sub> at baseline. Δ<sub>MCT</sub>FEV<sub>1</sub> (difference between baseline and after the last methacholine dose) significantly correlated with Δ<sub>MCT</sub>R<sub>5</sub>, Δ<sub>MCT</sub>X<sub>5</sub> and Δ<sub>MCT</sub>AX<sub>5</sub> in all subjects <italic>(p < 0.05)</italic>. Six subjects (30%) had a positive MCT for whom Δ<sub>BDT</sub>FEV<sub>1</sub> (difference between the value before and after BDT) significantly correlated with Δ<sub>BDT</sub>X<sub>5</sub> and Δ<sub>BDT</sub>R<sub>5-20</sub> <italic>(p < 0.05)</italic>. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> IOS may be a valuable alternative to spirometry in MCT and BDT. Our findings show that the most suitable IOS indices for MCT assessment are R<sub>5</sub>, X<sub>5</sub> and AX<sub>5</sub>, and for BDT – X<sub>5</sub> and R<sub>5-20</sub>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2025.pa956
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of impulse oscillometry indices and FEV1 during methacholine challenge and bronchodilation tests

Kęstutis Malakauskas, Sabina Gasperovič
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

Comparison of impulse oscillometry indices and FEV1 during methacholine challenge and bronchodilation tests

Kęstutis Malakauskas, Sabina Gasperovič
article en

Abstract

<bold>Background:</bold> Spirometry is the most used technique in methacholine challenge test (MCT) and bronchodilation test (BDT), however impulse oscillometry (IOS) could also be used as an alternative method. <bold>Objective:</bold> To demonstrate that IOS can be a reliable alternative to spirometry in MCT and BDT. <bold>Methods:</bold> Study included 20 subjects with suspected asthma (12 males, 8 females, mean age 41.5 ± 15.1). All participants underwent MCT using dosimeter (ProvoX, Ganshorn, Germany). FEV<sub>1</sub> (Spiroscout, Ganshorn, Germany) and IOS (Tremoflo C-100, Thorasys, Canada) parameters – airway resistance at 5 Hz (R<sub>5</sub>), 20 Hz (R<sub>20</sub>), 5–20 Hz (R<sub>5-20</sub>), reactance at 5 Hz (X<sub>5</sub>), reactance area at 5 Hz (AX<sub>5</sub>) were recorded at the beginning of the test and after each methacholine dose. In subjects for whom MCT was positive, bronchodilation using salbutamol was performed and FEV<sub>1</sub> and IOS indices were re-recorded. <bold>Results:</bold> At baseline and after the last methacholine dose a significant correlation was observed between FEV<sub>1</sub> and all IOS indices <italic>(p < 0.05)</italic>, except R<sub>5-20</sub> at baseline. Δ<sub>MCT</sub>FEV<sub>1</sub> (difference between baseline and after the last methacholine dose) significantly correlated with Δ<sub>MCT</sub>R<sub>5</sub>, Δ<sub>MCT</sub>X<sub>5</sub> and Δ<sub>MCT</sub>AX<sub>5</sub> in all subjects <italic>(p < 0.05)</italic>. Six subjects (30%) had a positive MCT for whom Δ<sub>BDT</sub>FEV<sub>1</sub> (difference between the value before and after BDT) significantly correlated with Δ<sub>BDT</sub>X<sub>5</sub> and Δ<sub>BDT</sub>R<sub>5-20</sub> <italic>(p < 0.05)</italic>. <bold>Conclusion:</bold> IOS may be a valuable alternative to spirometry in MCT and BDT. Our findings show that the most suitable IOS indices for MCT assessment are R<sub>5</sub>, X<sub>5</sub> and AX<sub>5</sub>, and for BDT – X<sub>5</sub> and R<sub>5-20</sub>.

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.