The Ethics of Leveraging Routinely Collected Patient Data for AI Development: Mixed Methods Study

Responsible AI development requires explicit attention to how EHR data are produced, interpreted, and governed in practice, recognizing that data quality and meaning are shaped by the clinical, institutional, and social contexts in which they originate. Technical solutions or top-down regulation alone are insufficient. Instead, stakeholder-led and context-sensitive approaches are needed to define the purposes, risks, and benefits of medical AI. Grounded in the realities of health care practice and in the perspectives of patients, clinicians, and data custodians, these approaches can strengthen transparency, fairness, and clinical relevance, ensuring that EHR data are used ethically and effectively to support equitable and trustworthy AI innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/79863
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Ethics of Leveraging Routinely Collected Patient Data for AI Development: Mixed Methods Study

Joanna E. Klopotowska, Joris E. Lieverse, Ronald Cornet, Daniel Fernández-Llaneza et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Ethics of Leveraging Routinely Collected Patient Data for AI Development: Mixed Methods Study

Joanna E. Klopotowska, Joris E. Lieverse, Ronald Cornet, Daniel Fernández-Llaneza, Marieke Bak, Mariëtte van den Hoven, Menno Maris
article en

Abstract

Responsible AI development requires explicit attention to how EHR data are produced, interpreted, and governed in practice, recognizing that data quality and meaning are shaped by the clinical, institutional, and social contexts in which they originate. Technical solutions or top-down regulation alone are insufficient. Instead, stakeholder-led and context-sensitive approaches are needed to define the purposes, risks, and benefits of medical AI. Grounded in the realities of health care practice and in the perspectives of patients, clinicians, and data custodians, these approaches can strengthen transparency, fairness, and clinical relevance, ensuring that EHR data are used ethically and effectively to support equitable and trustworthy AI innovation.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 28
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Technical University of Munich (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Ethics of Leveraging Routinely Collected Patient Data for AI Development: Mixed Methods Study — Joanna E. Klopotowska, Joris E. Lieverse, et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS