Bank to the world, arm of the state: US sanctions against Russia and the Federal Reserve

Abstract The Federal Reserve has participated in the US government’s Russia sanctions regime by freezing and seizing Russian central bank assets after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Traditionally, such assets have been immune from seizure under US and international law. This article considers the costs of the Federal Reserve’s role in this policy change, even if the benefits outweigh those costs. The shift exemplifies the American turn towards financial warfare as a foreign policy tool, unsettles established norms of international law, and pressures the principle of central bank independence. Whatever the near-term benefits, including the Fed in the sanctions regime may carry long-term costs for US financial leadership.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Economic Law
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf043
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank to the world, arm of the state: US sanctions against Russia and the Federal Reserve

David Zaring
Journal of International Economic Law
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Bank to the world, arm of the state: US sanctions against Russia and the Federal Reserve

David Zaring
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Federal Reserve has participated in the US government’s Russia sanctions regime by freezing and seizing Russian central bank assets after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Traditionally, such assets have been immune from seizure under US and international law. This article considers the costs of the Federal Reserve’s role in this policy change, even if the benefits outweigh those costs. The shift exemplifies the American turn towards financial warfare as a foreign policy tool, unsettles established norms of international law, and pressures the principle of central bank independence. Whatever the near-term benefits, including the Fed in the sanctions regime may carry long-term costs for US financial leadership.

Journal of International Economic LawVol. 28(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.