Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Career Advancement Strategies for Mid-level Women in Student Affairs

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on the push and pull factors that influence women’s choices to either opt in or opt out of career advancement in student affairs (Coetzee & Moosa, 2020; Harman & Sealy, 2017). Women, specifically Black women, are underrepresented in Senior Student Affairs Officer (SSAO) positions in higher education (American Council of Education, 2024). As the demographics of the United States (US) change, student affairs is at a critical point to foster an inclusive learning environment that reflects the increasing racial and ethnic diversity in the US (Lopez, 2006). Hiring managers and key decision makers in colleges and universities have the opportunity to identify, develop, and advance women to fill SSAO positions historically occupied by White men (Shults, 2001). A literature review was conducted to identify factors influencing career advancement for mid-level women in student affairs. The findings reveal factors influencing career advancement, including barriers such as the glass ceiling phenomenon (Abbas et al., 2021), institutional factors (Gardner et al., 2014), support and engagement (Garza, 2019), work and life balance (Redmond et al., 2017), and gender and racial discrimination (Abbas et al., 2021). The results can provide strategies for institutions and women contemplating career advancement to work together in the decision-making process. These strategies can provide ways for colleges and universities to invest in women, retain talent, and increase gender and racial diversity in senior administrator positions in student affairs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Higher Education and Student Affairs
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20429/jhesa.2025.410105
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Career Advancement Strategies for Mid-level Women in Student Affairs

J Thompson
Journal of Higher Education and Student Affairs
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Career Advancement Strategies for Mid-level Women in Student Affairs

J Thompson
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on the push and pull factors that influence women’s choices to either opt in or opt out of career advancement in student affairs (Coetzee & Moosa, 2020; Harman & Sealy, 2017). Women, specifically Black women, are underrepresented in Senior Student Affairs Officer (SSAO) positions in higher education (American Council of Education, 2024). As the demographics of the United States (US) change, student affairs is at a critical point to foster an inclusive learning environment that reflects the increasing racial and ethnic diversity in the US (Lopez, 2006). Hiring managers and key decision makers in colleges and universities have the opportunity to identify, develop, and advance women to fill SSAO positions historically occupied by White men (Shults, 2001). A literature review was conducted to identify factors influencing career advancement for mid-level women in student affairs. The findings reveal factors influencing career advancement, including barriers such as the glass ceiling phenomenon (Abbas et al., 2021), institutional factors (Gardner et al., 2014), support and engagement (Garza, 2019), work and life balance (Redmond et al., 2017), and gender and racial discrimination (Abbas et al., 2021). The results can provide strategies for institutions and women contemplating career advancement to work together in the decision-making process. These strategies can provide ways for colleges and universities to invest in women, retain talent, and increase gender and racial diversity in senior administrator positions in student affairs.

Journal of Higher Education and Student Affairs
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.