Appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of a Latin American and Caribbean code against cancer in Colombia

<title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec> <title>Objectives.</title> This study aimed to contrast Colombian stakeholders’ perceptions of the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of a code against cancer for Latin America and the Caribbean. </sec> <sec> <title>Methods.</title> This qualitative study used semistructured interviews and focus groups. Three stakeholder categories were considered: primary care physicians, decision-makers and program managers, and participants from the general population. Data collection followed the four domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (i.e. inner settings, outer settings, intervention and participants’ characteristics). Thematic areas included knowledge about cancer prevention, clarity of the proposed code and the appropriateness of recommendations. </sec> <sec> <title>Results.</title> Seventy participants were recruited (14 decision-makers and program managers, 16 primary care physicians, 40 members of the public). A code was considered suitable for cancer prevention; however, decision-makers, program managers and primary care physicians did not see it as a priority or as significantly more valuable than existing alternatives. The primary care physicians had clear ideas about a code’s recommendations for cancer prevention, but the general public associated certain recommendations with healthy lifestyles rather than with cancer prevention. Although participants had a hypercritical perspective about a Latin American code, they perceived it as a useful tool for policy development and for guiding preventive services and self-care. Regarding feasibility, participants perceived they would be able to implement and adopt a code (i.e. high self-efficacy) and considered that it would be straightforward to use (i.e. a tool with low complexity), and they forecasted strong commitment among institutions to implementing it. </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions.</title> A code against cancer was perceived as an appropriate, acceptable and feasible tool for cancer prevention that would be compatible with Colombia’s policy and health system environments. However, no urgent need for its implementation was discerned, and stakeholders’ opinions on relative priorities varied. Thus, careful design of implementation strategies will be key to successful cancer prevention. </sec>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2025.111
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of a Latin American and Caribbean code against cancer in Colombia

Carolina Espina, Pilar García-Padilla, Dennys García-Padilla, Silvina Arrossi et al.
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of a Latin American and Caribbean code against cancer in Colombia

Carolina Espina, Pilar García-Padilla, Dennys García-Padilla, Silvina Arrossi, Natalia Alexandra Chaparro-Betancourt, Raúl Murillo
article en

Abstract

<title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec> <title>Objectives.</title> This study aimed to contrast Colombian stakeholders’ perceptions of the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of a code against cancer for Latin America and the Caribbean. </sec> <sec> <title>Methods.</title> This qualitative study used semistructured interviews and focus groups. Three stakeholder categories were considered: primary care physicians, decision-makers and program managers, and participants from the general population. Data collection followed the four domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (i.e. inner settings, outer settings, intervention and participants’ characteristics). Thematic areas included knowledge about cancer prevention, clarity of the proposed code and the appropriateness of recommendations. </sec> <sec> <title>Results.</title> Seventy participants were recruited (14 decision-makers and program managers, 16 primary care physicians, 40 members of the public). A code was considered suitable for cancer prevention; however, decision-makers, program managers and primary care physicians did not see it as a priority or as significantly more valuable than existing alternatives. The primary care physicians had clear ideas about a code’s recommendations for cancer prevention, but the general public associated certain recommendations with healthy lifestyles rather than with cancer prevention. Although participants had a hypercritical perspective about a Latin American code, they perceived it as a useful tool for policy development and for guiding preventive services and self-care. Regarding feasibility, participants perceived they would be able to implement and adopt a code (i.e. high self-efficacy) and considered that it would be straightforward to use (i.e. a tool with low complexity), and they forecasted strong commitment among institutions to implementing it. </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions.</title> A code against cancer was perceived as an appropriate, acceptable and feasible tool for cancer prevention that would be compatible with Colombia’s policy and health system environments. However, no urgent need for its implementation was discerned, and stakeholders’ opinions on relative priorities varied. Thus, careful design of implementation strategies will be key to successful cancer prevention. </sec>

Revista Panamericana de Salud PúblicaVol. 49
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO), Center for the Study of State and Society (AR), Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (CO), Ansgar University College (NO), Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.