A Systematic Literature Review of Precision Anesthesia Through Machine Learning: Automated Drug Titration and Real-Time Physiologic Optimization

The integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into anesthesia practice represents a paradigm shift toward precision medicine by enabling automated, data-driven decision-making during surgery. This systematic review aimed to evaluate current applications of ML for automated drug titration and real-time physiologic optimization in anesthesia. A comprehensive literature search, adhering to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines, was performed across five databases (SciSpace, Google Scholar, PubMed, ArXiv, and Scopus) for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies examined ML- or AI-based systems for closed-loop anesthesia control, individualized dosing, or physiologic monitoring in either clinical environments or validated simulation settings. Of the 245 studies initially identified, 26 met the inclusion criteria after title and abstract screening. The most commonly used ML architectures included reinforcement learning (RL), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and ensemble tree-based methods. Key applications included closed-loop propofol infusion control, multimodal signal integration for depth-of-anesthesia assessment, and adaptive physiologic optimization systems. ML-guided controllers demonstrated superior performance in target maintenance, dosing precision, and physiologic stability compared to conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithms. Despite these promising findings, most studies relied on retrospective data or simulation-based testing, with only a small number advancing to prospective clinical evaluation. While ML-enabled precision anesthesia shows substantial promise for improving dosing accuracy, patient safety, and intraoperative efficiency, broad adoption will depend on rigorous clinical validation, clear regulatory pathways, and strong safety frameworks to ensure dependable performance in real-world settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97747
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Literature Review of Precision Anesthesia Through Machine Learning: Automated Drug Titration and Real-Time Physiologic Optimization

Leslie Torgerson, Reza Zarei
1 citations
Cureus
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
2.19
article

A Systematic Literature Review of Precision Anesthesia Through Machine Learning: Automated Drug Titration and Real-Time Physiologic Optimization

Leslie Torgerson, Reza Zarei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into anesthesia practice represents a paradigm shift toward precision medicine by enabling automated, data-driven decision-making during surgery. This systematic review aimed to evaluate current applications of ML for automated drug titration and real-time physiologic optimization in anesthesia. A comprehensive literature search, adhering to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines, was performed across five databases (SciSpace, Google Scholar, PubMed, ArXiv, and Scopus) for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Eligible studies examined ML- or AI-based systems for closed-loop anesthesia control, individualized dosing, or physiologic monitoring in either clinical environments or validated simulation settings. Of the 245 studies initially identified, 26 met the inclusion criteria after title and abstract screening. The most commonly used ML architectures included reinforcement learning (RL), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and ensemble tree-based methods. Key applications included closed-loop propofol infusion control, multimodal signal integration for depth-of-anesthesia assessment, and adaptive physiologic optimization systems. ML-guided controllers demonstrated superior performance in target maintenance, dosing precision, and physiologic stability compared to conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) algorithms. Despite these promising findings, most studies relied on retrospective data or simulation-based testing, with only a small number advancing to prospective clinical evaluation. While ML-enabled precision anesthesia shows substantial promise for improving dosing accuracy, patient safety, and intraoperative efficiency, broad adoption will depend on rigorous clinical validation, clear regulatory pathways, and strong safety frameworks to ensure dependable performance in real-world settings.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Rocky Vista University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Systematic Literature Review of Precision Anesthesia Through Machine Learning: Automated Drug Titration and Real-Time Physiologic Optimization — Leslie Torgerson, Reza Zarei · Cureus (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS