Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for patient safety in complex surgery: a review

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being used in surgical care; however, their real-world impact on patient safety is not well established. This narrative review searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for English-language studies published from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2025, that evaluated AI and ML applications in complex surgery and reported quantitative patient safety outcomes. Eligible included studies were published between 2016 and 2025. In total, 21 studies were synthesized across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of the study. Preoperatively, ML models consistently outperformed traditional risk scores in identifying high-risk patients and anticipating technical difficulties. Intraoperatively, AI-enabled decision support reduced hypotension exposure in a randomized trial, and computer vision systems supported the safety-critical step verification and instrument tracking. Postoperatively, multimodal approaches combining electronic records, imaging, and smartphone wound photographs predicted complications, such as surgical site infection, and facilitated discharge planning. Emerging evidence from ambulatory surgery, imaging-guided triage, and specialty domains, alongside qualitative studies on workforce readiness, highlights implementation opportunities and human factor requirements. Most evidence is retrospective, single-center, or prototype stage with limited external validation and uncertain generalizability across settings, including low- and middle-income countries. Priorities include multicenter prospective trials, standardized outcomes and reporting, continuous bias and model drift monitoring, robust data infrastructure, and equity-focused implementation to translate algorithmic performance into fewer complications, deaths, and costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Patient Safety in Surgery
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-025-00458-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for patient safety in complex surgery: a review

Zhinya Kawa Othman, Olalekan John Okesanya, Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Francesco Branda et al.
1 citations
Patient Safety in Surgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches for patient safety in complex surgery: a review

Zhinya Kawa Othman, Olalekan John Okesanya, Shuaibu Saidu Musa, Francesco Branda, Don Eliseo Lucero‐Prisno, Omar Kasimieh, Victor C. Cañezo, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Uthman Okikiola Adebayo, Edgar G. Cue
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being used in surgical care; however, their real-world impact on patient safety is not well established. This narrative review searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for English-language studies published from January 1, 2015, to April 30, 2025, that evaluated AI and ML applications in complex surgery and reported quantitative patient safety outcomes. Eligible included studies were published between 2016 and 2025. In total, 21 studies were synthesized across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of the study. Preoperatively, ML models consistently outperformed traditional risk scores in identifying high-risk patients and anticipating technical difficulties. Intraoperatively, AI-enabled decision support reduced hypotension exposure in a randomized trial, and computer vision systems supported the safety-critical step verification and instrument tracking. Postoperatively, multimodal approaches combining electronic records, imaging, and smartphone wound photographs predicted complications, such as surgical site infection, and facilitated discharge planning. Emerging evidence from ambulatory surgery, imaging-guided triage, and specialty domains, alongside qualitative studies on workforce readiness, highlights implementation opportunities and human factor requirements. Most evidence is retrospective, single-center, or prototype stage with limited external validation and uncertain generalizability across settings, including low- and middle-income countries. Priorities include multicenter prospective trials, standardized outcomes and reporting, continuous bias and model drift monitoring, robust data infrastructure, and equity-focused implementation to translate algorithmic performance into fewer complications, deaths, and costs.

Patient Safety in SurgeryVol. 19(1)
Bukidnon State University (PH), University of Thessaly (GR), Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Chulalongkorn University (TH), Federal Neuro Psychiatric Hospital (NG), Instituto de Montañas (US), Palompon Institute of Technology (PH), Naval State University (PH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), University of the East Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center (PH), SIMAD University (SO), Kurdistan Technical Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.