A ‘New Hope’ for Moon formation: presenting a multiple-impact pathway

ABSTRACT The leading hypothesis for the origin of the Moon, that of a single giant impact, faces significant challenges. These include either the need for an impactor with a near-identical composition to Earth or an extremely high mass or high energy impact to achieve near-complete material mixing. In this paper, we explore an alternative, the ‘multiple impact hypothesis’, which relaxes the compositional constraints on both the target and projectile, and allows for the consideration of more probable, less extreme impacts that steadily grow the Earth and Moon to their current size over several impact events. Using the hydrodynamical code swift, we simulate ‘chains’ of impacts and follow the growth of a moon around a planet analogous to our own. Our results demonstrate that chains of three or more impacts can produce systems comparable to the Earth–Moon system while achieving higher compositional similarities than the canonical giant impact scenario. This presents the multiple impact hypothesis as a promising alternative to the single large impact scenario for the origin of the Moon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf2084
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ‘New Hope’ for Moon formation: presenting a multiple-impact pathway

Philip J. Carter, Z. M. Leinhardt, Jingyao Dou, Huw G. Davies et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

A ‘New Hope’ for Moon formation: presenting a multiple-impact pathway

Philip J. Carter, Z. M. Leinhardt, Jingyao Dou, Huw G. Davies, Louis Eddershaw
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The leading hypothesis for the origin of the Moon, that of a single giant impact, faces significant challenges. These include either the need for an impactor with a near-identical composition to Earth or an extremely high mass or high energy impact to achieve near-complete material mixing. In this paper, we explore an alternative, the ‘multiple impact hypothesis’, which relaxes the compositional constraints on both the target and projectile, and allows for the consideration of more probable, less extreme impacts that steadily grow the Earth and Moon to their current size over several impact events. Using the hydrodynamical code swift, we simulate ‘chains’ of impacts and follow the growth of a moon around a planet analogous to our own. Our results demonstrate that chains of three or more impacts can produce systems comparable to the Earth–Moon system while achieving higher compositional similarities than the canonical giant impact scenario. This presents the multiple impact hypothesis as a promising alternative to the single large impact scenario for the origin of the Moon.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 545(2)
University of Bristol (GB), Bristol Robotics Laboratory (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
University of Bristol, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.