Erratum: Refining Galactic primordial black hole evaporation constraints [Phys. Rev. D <b>110</b> , 123022 (2024)]

We correct the results obtained using the diffuse x-ray emission from Xmm-Newton, in light of new results from Ref. [1], that demonstrated that the dataset employed was misevaluated.We also update our calculation of the 511 keVemission from evaporating PBHs, which leads to slightly more conservative constraints as well.Reference [1], alongside with private communication with the authors of Ref.[2], suggest that recent bounds derived using Xmm-Newton data need to be revised.This arises from a misinterpretation regarding the solid angle of the observations with respect to the geometrical factor of a given ROI (which are 30 cocentric rings centered on the Galactic Center), this has also affected other recent dark matter (DM) indirect searches.In Ref.[2], they provide data that are normalized by the exposure-weighted average solid angle, which is orders of magnitude smaller than the geometric one.Taking for example Ring 3 (12-18), which was relevant to our work, the exposure-weighted average solid angle is 3.463 10 -5 sr, while the geometric angle is 0.156 sr, which is more than 4 orders of magnitude higher.FIG. 1.Comparison of the predicted DM-induced x-ray emission with diffuse x-ray data from Xmm-Newton in a region close to the Galactic Center.We show the prediction is shown for different values of M PBH when the PBH mass distribution is monochromatic (upper left panel), of a (upper right panel) and when the distribution is log-normal (lower panel).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/msry-jczm
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erratum: Refining Galactic primordial black hole evaporation constraints [Phys. Rev. D 110 , 123022 (2024)]

S. Balaji, Pedro De la Torre Luque, Jordan Koechler
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
1.15
article

Erratum: Refining Galactic primordial black hole evaporation constraints [Phys. Rev. D 110 , 123022 (2024)]

S. Balaji, Pedro De la Torre Luque, Jordan Koechler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We correct the results obtained using the diffuse x-ray emission from Xmm-Newton, in light of new results from Ref. [1], that demonstrated that the dataset employed was misevaluated.We also update our calculation of the 511 keVemission from evaporating PBHs, which leads to slightly more conservative constraints as well.Reference [1], alongside with private communication with the authors of Ref.[2], suggest that recent bounds derived using Xmm-Newton data need to be revised.This arises from a misinterpretation regarding the solid angle of the observations with respect to the geometrical factor of a given ROI (which are 30 cocentric rings centered on the Galactic Center), this has also affected other recent dark matter (DM) indirect searches.In Ref.[2], they provide data that are normalized by the exposure-weighted average solid angle, which is orders of magnitude smaller than the geometric one.Taking for example Ring 3 (12-18), which was relevant to our work, the exposure-weighted average solid angle is 3.463 10 -5 sr, while the geometric angle is 0.156 sr, which is more than 4 orders of magnitude higher.FIG. 1.Comparison of the predicted DM-induced x-ray emission with diffuse x-ray data from Xmm-Newton in a region close to the Galactic Center.We show the prediction is shown for different values of M PBH when the PBH mass distribution is monochromatic (upper left panel), of a (upper right panel) and when the distribution is log-normal (lower panel).

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Erratum: Refining Galactic primordial black hole evaporation constraints [Phys. Rev. D <b>110</b> , 123022 (2024)] — S. Balaji, Pedro De la Torre Luque, et al. · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS