What is good scientific expertise for decision-making? Relevance matters
This article aims to clarify the conditions under which communication between scientific experts and decision-makers succeeds – or fails – by emphasising the importance of the relevance of the information provided in relation to the questions decision-makers are asking. It focuses in particular on the courtroom setting, which offers a close-up view of the crucial role played by the relevance of the questions addressed to experts and the answers they provide.
Authors
- Marion Vorms (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-9157)
- Anouk Barberousse
Institutions
- Philips (Finland) (FI)
- University College Lahore (PK)
- Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (FR)
- Sciences, Philosophie, Histoire (FR)
- Sciences, Normes, Démocratie (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Lato Sensu Revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences
- Published
- 2025-11-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.20416/lsrsps.v12i1.3
- Primary Topic
- Jury Decision Making Processes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00