Navigating the Culture of Biology: Comparing Latinas’ Experience with Asian and Black Undergraduate Women at an MSI

Women in science, technology, engineering and mathermatics (STEM) point to a competitive, predominantly white, male-dominant STEM culture where women confront a "chilly climate" and microaggressions. This includes biology, where there is gender parity, but underrepresented minority (URM) disparities prevail. We draw on qualitative data-focus groups, in-depth interviews, and journal entries-to compare the experiences of Latina, self-identified Black, and Asian American women in a biology undergraduate program at a prestigious Minority Serving Institution. We find that all women identify a competitive culture in biology, but differed in how they interpreted and navigated the major. Class-diverse Asian American women and white presenting, middle-class Latinas interpreted STEM culture through a meritocratic, colorblind lens, reflecting their seamless academic and social integration. In contrast, first-generation college-going, working-class Latinas and Black women, who were middle class in this study, interpreted the biology classroom culture through a class and racial lens. Working-class Latinas, in particular, experienced academic culture shock and, like Black women, had racialized interactions, reported being rebuffed when interacting and attempting to collaborate with predominantly Asian peers. URM women, including at MSIs, experience a competitive, non-collaborative culture in biology, with working-class Latinas culturally sidelined and, like Black women, racialized negatively in the major.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.25-05-0101
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Culture of Biology: Comparing Latinas’ Experience with Asian and Black Undergraduate Women at an MSI

María G. Rendón, Glenda M. Flores, David R. Schaefer
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Career Development and Diversity
article

Navigating the Culture of Biology: Comparing Latinas’ Experience with Asian and Black Undergraduate Women at an MSI

María G. Rendón, Glenda M. Flores, David R. Schaefer
article en

Abstract

Women in science, technology, engineering and mathermatics (STEM) point to a competitive, predominantly white, male-dominant STEM culture where women confront a "chilly climate" and microaggressions. This includes biology, where there is gender parity, but underrepresented minority (URM) disparities prevail. We draw on qualitative data-focus groups, in-depth interviews, and journal entries-to compare the experiences of Latina, self-identified Black, and Asian American women in a biology undergraduate program at a prestigious Minority Serving Institution. We find that all women identify a competitive culture in biology, but differed in how they interpreted and navigated the major. Class-diverse Asian American women and white presenting, middle-class Latinas interpreted STEM culture through a meritocratic, colorblind lens, reflecting their seamless academic and social integration. In contrast, first-generation college-going, working-class Latinas and Black women, who were middle class in this study, interpreted the biology classroom culture through a class and racial lens. Working-class Latinas, in particular, experienced academic culture shock and, like Black women, had racialized interactions, reported being rebuffed when interacting and attempting to collaborate with predominantly Asian peers. URM women, including at MSIs, experience a competitive, non-collaborative culture in biology, with working-class Latinas culturally sidelined and, like Black women, racialized negatively in the major.

CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 24(4)
University of California, Irvine (US)
National Science Foundation, University of California, Irvine
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.