Network analysis and comparison of psychological distress among women with miscarriage experience

As many as 15.3% of pregnancies do not end in a live birth meaning miscarriage is among the most common pregnancy complications. This experience is robustly evidenced to be associated with adverse health and well-being outcomes for mothers, however, much existing evidence focuses on psychopathology outcomes such as depression and anxiety disorders. Adopting a holistic approach inclusive of more nuanced mental health outcomes of pregnancy loss, this study sought to assess and compare distress among women experiencing miscarriage at home or in hospital. The current study applied Network Analysis to examine associations between indicators of psychological distress (e.g. feelings of loss, isolation, and devastation) in a sample of 839 women. Networks were assessed to identify the most influential indicators for the total sample of women who experienced miscarriage in the previous 5 years (<i>N</i> = 839), and for subsamples who reported experiencing management of their miscarriage at home (<i>n</i> = 493), or in hospital (<i>n</i> = 273). Results highlighted the most influential distress indicators in the network to be: '<i>feelings of a person lost</i>', '<i>destroyed zest for life</i>', and '<i>feelings of isolation</i>'. Comparison between subgroups, those who experienced miscarriage at home and in hospital, revealed similar network structures. Those who experienced miscarriage at home displayed greater global association between nodes in the network, i.e. stronger connections between distress indicators suggesting these have greater influence on each other a potentially exacerbate distress. The most influential distress indicators are highlighted as important targets for screening psychological distress, and as potentially viable intervention targets to promote greater well-being among women experiencing miscarriage, regardless of setting. These findings provide a novel understanding of psychological distress following miscarriage as a system of connected symptoms, further research is called for to examine broader influences of the impact of miscarriage network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Health & Medicine
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2587261
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Network analysis and comparison of psychological distress among women with miscarriage experience

Martin Robinson, Áine Aventin, Gary A. Mitchell, Mark Tomlinson et al.
1 citations
Psychology Health & Medicine
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
2.31
article

Network analysis and comparison of psychological distress among women with miscarriage experience

Martin Robinson, Áine Aventin, Gary A. Mitchell, Mark Tomlinson, Martina Galeotti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As many as 15.3% of pregnancies do not end in a live birth meaning miscarriage is among the most common pregnancy complications. This experience is robustly evidenced to be associated with adverse health and well-being outcomes for mothers, however, much existing evidence focuses on psychopathology outcomes such as depression and anxiety disorders. Adopting a holistic approach inclusive of more nuanced mental health outcomes of pregnancy loss, this study sought to assess and compare distress among women experiencing miscarriage at home or in hospital. The current study applied Network Analysis to examine associations between indicators of psychological distress (e.g. feelings of loss, isolation, and devastation) in a sample of 839 women. Networks were assessed to identify the most influential indicators for the total sample of women who experienced miscarriage in the previous 5 years (<i>N</i> = 839), and for subsamples who reported experiencing management of their miscarriage at home (<i>n</i> = 493), or in hospital (<i>n</i> = 273). Results highlighted the most influential distress indicators in the network to be: '<i>feelings of a person lost</i>', '<i>destroyed zest for life</i>', and '<i>feelings of isolation</i>'. Comparison between subgroups, those who experienced miscarriage at home and in hospital, revealed similar network structures. Those who experienced miscarriage at home displayed greater global association between nodes in the network, i.e. stronger connections between distress indicators suggesting these have greater influence on each other a potentially exacerbate distress. The most influential distress indicators are highlighted as important targets for screening psychological distress, and as potentially viable intervention targets to promote greater well-being among women experiencing miscarriage, regardless of setting. These findings provide a novel understanding of psychological distress following miscarriage as a system of connected symptoms, further research is called for to examine broader influences of the impact of miscarriage network.

Psychology Health & MedicineVol. 31(4)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Department for the Economy, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.