Impact of bacterial inactivation methods on Caenorhabditis elegans feeding and healthspan

Accurate bacterial inactivation methods are essential for nutritional and microbiota studies in Caenorhabditis elegans, to determine whether the observed effects arise from nutrients provided by ingested bacteria or from active symbiotic interactions. However, some inactivation methods alter bacterial palatability, complicating conclusions about their direct impact. We aimed to identify an effective method for inactivating the bacterial strain Escherichia coli OP50, the standard food source for most C. elegans experiments, that preserves normal behavior and physiology in C. elegans. We compared heat inactivation (65 °C for 35 min) with 0.5% paraformaldehyde (PFA) inactivation. Worms fed PFA-inactivated bacteria showed no food aversion, and maintained wild-type pharyngeal pumping levels, fertility rates, and lipid accumulation, closely resembling the behavior and physiology of worms fed alive E. coli OP50. In contrast, heat‑inactivated bacteria elicited strong food avoidance, reduced pumping activity, activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR<sup>mt</sup>), decreased lipid stores and fertility, and increased survival relative to the other groups. These findings demonstrate that 0.5% PFA inactivation more accurately preserves C. elegans physiological and behavioral traits than heat inactivation, making it a more suitable method for microbiota and nutritional studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27444-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of bacterial inactivation methods on Caenorhabditis elegans feeding and healthspan

Stéphanie Miard, Veronique Thériault, Stefan Taubert, Frédéric Picard et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
0.95
article

Impact of bacterial inactivation methods on Caenorhabditis elegans feeding and healthspan

Stéphanie Miard, Veronique Thériault, Stefan Taubert, Frédéric Picard, C. Rosa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate bacterial inactivation methods are essential for nutritional and microbiota studies in Caenorhabditis elegans, to determine whether the observed effects arise from nutrients provided by ingested bacteria or from active symbiotic interactions. However, some inactivation methods alter bacterial palatability, complicating conclusions about their direct impact. We aimed to identify an effective method for inactivating the bacterial strain Escherichia coli OP50, the standard food source for most C. elegans experiments, that preserves normal behavior and physiology in C. elegans. We compared heat inactivation (65 °C for 35 min) with 0.5% paraformaldehyde (PFA) inactivation. Worms fed PFA-inactivated bacteria showed no food aversion, and maintained wild-type pharyngeal pumping levels, fertility rates, and lipid accumulation, closely resembling the behavior and physiology of worms fed alive E. coli OP50. In contrast, heat‑inactivated bacteria elicited strong food avoidance, reduced pumping activity, activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR<sup>mt</sup>), decreased lipid stores and fertility, and increased survival relative to the other groups. These findings demonstrate that 0.5% PFA inactivation more accurately preserves C. elegans physiological and behavioral traits than heat inactivation, making it a more suitable method for microbiota and nutritional studies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA), Université Laval (CA)
Université Laval, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.