Comparing the spatial effects and longevity of key fuel treatments in California using spaceborne lidar data

Systematically comparing fuel treatment strategies' effects on vegetation and fuel structure is essential for mitigating wildfire risk, supporting forest management, and reducing climate-related impacts. While prescribed fire and mechanical activities have been compared using field data, large-scale comparisons across treatment types have been limited by inconsistent vegetation structure measurements. To address this gap, we integrate total of 29 million observations from NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne lidar mission with 2870 records from two fuel treatment datasets for California. We assessed spatial and temporal effects of fuel treatments in California forests. We compared broadcast burns, mechanical fuel reduction, fuel breaks, right-of-way clearance, and forest stewardship to untreated zones using GEDI-derived metrics: aboveground biomass density (AGBD), canopy cover, ladder fuels, canopy height, and layering. Broadcast burns produced significant reductions across all metrics, with the largest decrease in AGBD and canopy height (13-18 %). Mechanical fuel reduction significantly reduced all metrics except canopy height, though with smaller magnitude (6-16%). Fuel breaks yielded the greatest reductions in canopy cover, layering, and ladder fuels (19-26 %) but showed limited effects on canopy height and no significant reduction in AGBD. Using a space-for-time substitution analysis, we found mechanical treatments maintain reductions for 9-15 years across crown fuel metrics, lasting 6-9 years longer than prescribed fire. Managed wildfires showed heterogeneous recovery, while forest stewardship exhibited gradual regrowth. These findings underscore the value of GEDI and future active remote sensing missions for monitoring fuel treatment outcomes. Understanding ecological responses to treatments supports optimizing forest management to reduce wildfire risk in fire-prone regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128044
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the spatial effects and longevity of key fuel treatments in California using spaceborne lidar data

Lisa M. Villa, Christopher B. Field, Christopher R. Hakkenberg, Mengyu Liang et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Comparing the spatial effects and longevity of key fuel treatments in California using spaceborne lidar data

Lisa M. Villa, Christopher B. Field, Christopher R. Hakkenberg, Mengyu Liang, Laura Duncanson
article en

Abstract

Systematically comparing fuel treatment strategies' effects on vegetation and fuel structure is essential for mitigating wildfire risk, supporting forest management, and reducing climate-related impacts. While prescribed fire and mechanical activities have been compared using field data, large-scale comparisons across treatment types have been limited by inconsistent vegetation structure measurements. To address this gap, we integrate total of 29 million observations from NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne lidar mission with 2870 records from two fuel treatment datasets for California. We assessed spatial and temporal effects of fuel treatments in California forests. We compared broadcast burns, mechanical fuel reduction, fuel breaks, right-of-way clearance, and forest stewardship to untreated zones using GEDI-derived metrics: aboveground biomass density (AGBD), canopy cover, ladder fuels, canopy height, and layering. Broadcast burns produced significant reductions across all metrics, with the largest decrease in AGBD and canopy height (13-18 %). Mechanical fuel reduction significantly reduced all metrics except canopy height, though with smaller magnitude (6-16%). Fuel breaks yielded the greatest reductions in canopy cover, layering, and ladder fuels (19-26 %) but showed limited effects on canopy height and no significant reduction in AGBD. Using a space-for-time substitution analysis, we found mechanical treatments maintain reductions for 9-15 years across crown fuel metrics, lasting 6-9 years longer than prescribed fire. Managed wildfires showed heterogeneous recovery, while forest stewardship exhibited gradual regrowth. These findings underscore the value of GEDI and future active remote sensing missions for monitoring fuel treatment outcomes. Understanding ecological responses to treatments supports optimizing forest management to reduce wildfire risk in fire-prone regions.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 396
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Geographical Institute (HU), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.