Expanded polystyrene inclusion behind yielding wall: numerical study and cost analysis

The standard Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) effectiveness as compressible inclusion behind rigid non-yielding walls is verified by previous studies, but limited literature addresses its performance with rigid yielding walls, such as a cantilever retaining wall. The present study uses numerical modeling to examine the behavior of the yielding wall-inclusion system. The effects of inclusion thickness, density, placement height, and wall height are investigated. Among these, the EPS thickness is a governing parameter in the pressure reduction. The study further examines the mechanism of pressure reduction, and it is observed that major pressure reduction occurs at the bottom one-third of the wall. A cost analysis correlating the efficiency and cost of inclusion is presented, providing guidelines for practitioners to select inclusion thickness and estimate the associated costs to achieve a desired reduction in lateral pressure. Additionally, the cost analysis reveals that although the standard EPS reduces lateral pressure, it can cost up to 7% of the project cost, which is substantial. Alternatively, the use of elasticized EPS instead of standard EPS as an inclusion can reduce the thickness of the inclusion by 9% to 38% compared to standard EPS without compromising the inclusion efficiency, making it a more economical and effective solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geosynthetics International
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.25.00089
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanded polystyrene inclusion behind yielding wall: numerical study and cost analysis

Satyanarayana Murty Dasaka, Dinesh Bishnoi
Geosynthetics International
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Expanded polystyrene inclusion behind yielding wall: numerical study and cost analysis

Satyanarayana Murty Dasaka, Dinesh Bishnoi
article en

Abstract

The standard Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) effectiveness as compressible inclusion behind rigid non-yielding walls is verified by previous studies, but limited literature addresses its performance with rigid yielding walls, such as a cantilever retaining wall. The present study uses numerical modeling to examine the behavior of the yielding wall-inclusion system. The effects of inclusion thickness, density, placement height, and wall height are investigated. Among these, the EPS thickness is a governing parameter in the pressure reduction. The study further examines the mechanism of pressure reduction, and it is observed that major pressure reduction occurs at the bottom one-third of the wall. A cost analysis correlating the efficiency and cost of inclusion is presented, providing guidelines for practitioners to select inclusion thickness and estimate the associated costs to achieve a desired reduction in lateral pressure. Additionally, the cost analysis reveals that although the standard EPS reduces lateral pressure, it can cost up to 7% of the project cost, which is substantial. Alternatively, the use of elasticized EPS instead of standard EPS as an inclusion can reduce the thickness of the inclusion by 9% to 38% compared to standard EPS without compromising the inclusion efficiency, making it a more economical and effective solution.

Geosynthetics International
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.