Who Deserves a Tax Break? The Politics of Statute Affirmation in Nevada

In 1956 Nevada voters affirmed a referendum upholding the 1955 Sales and Use Tax Act establishing a two percent sales tax. Because the statute’s affirmation removed the law from the legislature’s purview, the only way it can be altered is by a vote of the people. Subsequently, the legislature has referred nearly three dozen questions to the ballot proposing to amend provisions of the 1955 legislation. While voters have rejected most of these proposals, voters have supported exemptions that provide diffuse benefits and that target sympathetic social groups, as well as a requirement that exemptions have a demonstrable social or economic benefit. In addition to bolstering the findings of prior research that direct democracy is used to advance conservative fiscal policies, this research details how Nevada’s direct democracy institutions have limited the legislature’s taxation authority by requiring that voters decide who is and is not deserving of a tax break.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
State and Local Government Review
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x251389016
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Deserves a Tax Break? The Politics of Statute Affirmation in Nevada

David F. Damore
State and Local Government Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Who Deserves a Tax Break? The Politics of Statute Affirmation in Nevada

David F. Damore
article en

Abstract

In 1956 Nevada voters affirmed a referendum upholding the 1955 Sales and Use Tax Act establishing a two percent sales tax. Because the statute’s affirmation removed the law from the legislature’s purview, the only way it can be altered is by a vote of the people. Subsequently, the legislature has referred nearly three dozen questions to the ballot proposing to amend provisions of the 1955 legislation. While voters have rejected most of these proposals, voters have supported exemptions that provide diffuse benefits and that target sympathetic social groups, as well as a requirement that exemptions have a demonstrable social or economic benefit. In addition to bolstering the findings of prior research that direct democracy is used to advance conservative fiscal policies, this research details how Nevada’s direct democracy institutions have limited the legislature’s taxation authority by requiring that voters decide who is and is not deserving of a tax break.

State and Local Government Review
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.