Symptom Duration as a Predictor of Neurological Recovery After Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Background The impact of symptom duration on postoperative recovery in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) remains controversial. While earlier decompression is often recommended, patient outcomes are likely influenced by a combination of factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the duration of symptoms significantly affects neurological recovery. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 142 consecutive patients (mean age 66.2 years, 63% male) who underwent anterior or posterior cervical decompression. Baseline variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, number of stenotic segments, surgical approach, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and duration of symptoms. Neurological function was assessed by JOA score preoperatively and at three and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate linear regression identified independent predictors of continuous JOA change, while multivariate logistic regression assessed factors associated with achieving a clinically meaningful gain (≥1.5 points in JOA score). Results Overall, JOA scores improved by 1.16 ± 2.1 points (8.9%; p < 0.001) at three months and by 1.60 ± 2.2 points (12.2%; p < 0.001) at 12 months. Patients with severe myelopathy (JOA < 12) demonstrated the greatest gains (+1.99 at three months; +4.58 at 12 months; both p < 0.01), whereas those with mild symptoms showed minimal change. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline JOA score was the sole predictor of greater continuous improvement at three months (p < 0.001) and remained significant at 12 months alongside ASA class (p = 0.017) and BMI (p = 0.027). Symptom duration did not predict the magnitude of continuous change. However, each additional month of preoperative symptoms decreased the odds of achieving a ≥1.5-point gain at three months by 0.7% (p = 0.045). By 12 months, only patient sex (male vs. female; OR: 0.81; p = 0.046) independently predicted clinically meaningful recovery. Conclusion Baseline neurological impairment is the strongest determinant of postoperative improvement in DCM, with systemic health also influencing long-term gains. Although longer symptom duration modestly reduces the likelihood of early clinically meaningful recovery, substantial improvement remains achievable after delay. These findings reinforce the importance of early diagnosis and timely surgical referral.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97729
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symptom Duration as a Predictor of Neurological Recovery After Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Frank Schmitz, Yazan Noufal, Philipp Hartung, Philipp Drees et al.
Cureus
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Symptom Duration as a Predictor of Neurological Recovery After Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Frank Schmitz, Yazan Noufal, Philipp Hartung, Philipp Drees, Yama Afghanyar, Martin Naisan, Marcus Richter
article en

Abstract

Background The impact of symptom duration on postoperative recovery in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) remains controversial. While earlier decompression is often recommended, patient outcomes are likely influenced by a combination of factors. This study aimed to evaluate whether the duration of symptoms significantly affects neurological recovery. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 142 consecutive patients (mean age 66.2 years, 63% male) who underwent anterior or posterior cervical decompression. Baseline variables included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, number of stenotic segments, surgical approach, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and duration of symptoms. Neurological function was assessed by JOA score preoperatively and at three and 12 months postoperatively. Multivariate linear regression identified independent predictors of continuous JOA change, while multivariate logistic regression assessed factors associated with achieving a clinically meaningful gain (≥1.5 points in JOA score). Results Overall, JOA scores improved by 1.16 ± 2.1 points (8.9%; p < 0.001) at three months and by 1.60 ± 2.2 points (12.2%; p < 0.001) at 12 months. Patients with severe myelopathy (JOA < 12) demonstrated the greatest gains (+1.99 at three months; +4.58 at 12 months; both p < 0.01), whereas those with mild symptoms showed minimal change. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline JOA score was the sole predictor of greater continuous improvement at three months (p < 0.001) and remained significant at 12 months alongside ASA class (p = 0.017) and BMI (p = 0.027). Symptom duration did not predict the magnitude of continuous change. However, each additional month of preoperative symptoms decreased the odds of achieving a ≥1.5-point gain at three months by 0.7% (p = 0.045). By 12 months, only patient sex (male vs. female; OR: 0.81; p = 0.046) independently predicted clinically meaningful recovery. Conclusion Baseline neurological impairment is the strongest determinant of postoperative improvement in DCM, with systemic health also influencing long-term gains. Although longer symptom duration modestly reduces the likelihood of early clinically meaningful recovery, substantial improvement remains achievable after delay. These findings reinforce the importance of early diagnosis and timely surgical referral.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), St. Josefs Hospital (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.