A theoretical model of AI bias mitigation: incentives, regulation and equilibrium

Purpose This study aims to develop a conceptual economic model to analyse bias in artificial intelligence (AI), decomposing it into functionality bias (arising from data and algorithms) and usage bias (stemming from user incentives). It explores how these biases interact and emerge endogenously in economic systems, proposing a cost-constrained optimisation framework for mitigation. Design/methodology/approach A mathematical optimisation model is formulated to minimise total bias, accounting for data curation costs, regulatory penalties and audit expenses. The model derives equilibrium conditions under which bias mitigation is cost-effective and identifies thresholds beyond which interventions fail. Findings Reducing usage bias enhances the effectiveness of functionality bias mitigation, creating a cascading fairness effect. High regulatory costs without incentive alignment can discourage mitigation, emphasising the need for balanced interventions. The model highlights the cost-fairness trade-offs and suggests critical thresholds for policy action. Research limitations/implications The theoretical conceptual model is static; future work should explore dynamic extensions and conduct empirical validation to enhance its applicability. Nonetheless, it provides a quantitative foundation linking AI ethics with economic policymaking. Practical implications Firms and policymakers can use the conceptual model to evaluate cost-efficient strategies for mitigating bias, particularly through early-stage interventions and the design of usage incentives. Social implications The study emphasises the importance of fairness in AI as both a technical and socioeconomic objective, essential for achieving equitable outcomes in areas such as finance, employment and public services. Originality/value Unlike prior approaches that treat fairness as exogenous, this study endogenises bias within an economic decision framework, presenting a novel lens to address AI fairness as a constrained optimisation problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-06-2025-0138
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A theoretical model of AI bias mitigation: incentives, regulation and equilibrium

Subhasis Bera, Ishika Bera
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A theoretical model of AI bias mitigation: incentives, regulation and equilibrium

Subhasis Bera, Ishika Bera
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop a conceptual economic model to analyse bias in artificial intelligence (AI), decomposing it into functionality bias (arising from data and algorithms) and usage bias (stemming from user incentives). It explores how these biases interact and emerge endogenously in economic systems, proposing a cost-constrained optimisation framework for mitigation. Design/methodology/approach A mathematical optimisation model is formulated to minimise total bias, accounting for data curation costs, regulatory penalties and audit expenses. The model derives equilibrium conditions under which bias mitigation is cost-effective and identifies thresholds beyond which interventions fail. Findings Reducing usage bias enhances the effectiveness of functionality bias mitigation, creating a cascading fairness effect. High regulatory costs without incentive alignment can discourage mitigation, emphasising the need for balanced interventions. The model highlights the cost-fairness trade-offs and suggests critical thresholds for policy action. Research limitations/implications The theoretical conceptual model is static; future work should explore dynamic extensions and conduct empirical validation to enhance its applicability. Nonetheless, it provides a quantitative foundation linking AI ethics with economic policymaking. Practical implications Firms and policymakers can use the conceptual model to evaluate cost-efficient strategies for mitigating bias, particularly through early-stage interventions and the design of usage incentives. Social implications The study emphasises the importance of fairness in AI as both a technical and socioeconomic objective, essential for achieving equitable outcomes in areas such as finance, employment and public services. Originality/value Unlike prior approaches that treat fairness as exogenous, this study endogenises bias within an economic decision framework, presenting a novel lens to address AI fairness as a constrained optimisation problem.

Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
International Management Institute (IN), Institute of Quantitative and Technical Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.