Editorial: Why the randomized controlled trial is still at the apex and the gold standard for evaluating new medical and surgical interventions

Why the randomized controlled trial is still at the apex and the gold standard for evaluating new medical and surgical interventions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.44947
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editorial: Why the randomized controlled trial is still at the apex and the gold standard for evaluating new medical and surgical interventions

Søren Overgaard, Aleksi Reito
Acta Orthopaedica
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Editorial: Why the randomized controlled trial is still at the apex and the gold standard for evaluating new medical and surgical interventions

Søren Overgaard, Aleksi Reito
article en

Abstract

Why the randomized controlled trial is still at the apex and the gold standard for evaluating new medical and surgical interventions

Acta OrthopaedicaVol. 96
Bispebjerg Hospital (DK), Coxa Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Editorial: Why the randomized controlled trial is still at the apex and the gold standard for evaluating new medical and surgical interventions — Søren Overgaard, Aleksi Reito · Acta Orthopaedica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS