Mapping average annual precipitation accounting for location-dependent variations

Abstract Geostatistical applications generally require the calculation of an experimental variogram and the fitting to it of a theoretical variogram model to describe and quantify spatial variation of the whole study area. Since in mountainous areas, it is not always reasonable to assume that a global variogram of the entire study area is suitable for modelling the spatial variation of precipitation, a solution could be using local parameters of the variogram. This study was aimed at determining whether the local geostatistics approach with varying variogram model parameters improves the modelling of average annual precipitation compared to the use of a global variogram with constant parameters for the entire study area. The study area was a region in southern Italy (Calabria) with a spatially variable Mediterranean climate. A dataset of 84 precipitation stations with long-term records (1951–2022) was used. A global variogram model of the precipitation data was calculated and fitted and used in the optimization of the local variograms parameters. Global and local variograms were used with block kriging with elevation as external drift to improve the estimation of precipitation. Using local parameters of variogram has allowed to improve the precipitation predictions as proven by all measures of accuracy (mean absolute error, root-mean-squared error of prediction, and mean relative error) and by the goodness-of-prediction of the estimates obtained by using the global and local parameters of variogram models. These results were also confirmed by R 2 values obtained from two scatterplots of predicted precipitation values using global variogram (R 2 = 0.58) and local parameters (R 2 = 0.74) versus measured values. The two approaches produced a general similar spatial distribution of average annual precipitation, but with specific differences at local level in more orographically complex areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-025-05909-x
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping average annual precipitation accounting for location-dependent variations

Massimo Conforti, Tommaso Caloiero, Gabriele Buttafuocò
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
article

Mapping average annual precipitation accounting for location-dependent variations

Massimo Conforti, Tommaso Caloiero, Gabriele Buttafuocò
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geostatistical applications generally require the calculation of an experimental variogram and the fitting to it of a theoretical variogram model to describe and quantify spatial variation of the whole study area. Since in mountainous areas, it is not always reasonable to assume that a global variogram of the entire study area is suitable for modelling the spatial variation of precipitation, a solution could be using local parameters of the variogram. This study was aimed at determining whether the local geostatistics approach with varying variogram model parameters improves the modelling of average annual precipitation compared to the use of a global variogram with constant parameters for the entire study area. The study area was a region in southern Italy (Calabria) with a spatially variable Mediterranean climate. A dataset of 84 precipitation stations with long-term records (1951–2022) was used. A global variogram model of the precipitation data was calculated and fitted and used in the optimization of the local variograms parameters. Global and local variograms were used with block kriging with elevation as external drift to improve the estimation of precipitation. Using local parameters of variogram has allowed to improve the precipitation predictions as proven by all measures of accuracy (mean absolute error, root-mean-squared error of prediction, and mean relative error) and by the goodness-of-prediction of the estimates obtained by using the global and local parameters of variogram models. These results were also confirmed by R 2 values obtained from two scatterplots of predicted precipitation values using global variogram (R 2 = 0.58) and local parameters (R 2 = 0.74) versus measured values. The two approaches produced a general similar spatial distribution of average annual precipitation, but with specific differences at local level in more orographically complex areas.

Theoretical and Applied ClimatologyVol. 156(12)
Research Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection (IT), Istituto per il Sistema Produzione Animale in Ambiente Mediterraneo (IT), National Research Council (IT), Institute for Agricultural and Forest Systems in the Mediterranean (IT)
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.