Who pays for preparedness? Valuing disaster app features through a factorial survey experiment in flood-prone communities

This study evaluates public preferences for next-generation disaster preparedness apps using a factorial survey experiment in flood-prone Japanese communities. The analysis first reveals a fundamental heterogeneity in public receptiveness, identifying two distinct segments: a small "receptive" minority (approx. 20%) willing to consider adoption, and a large "unreceptive" majority (approx. 80%) that rejects the app regardless of its features or price. Consequently, focusing on the receptive segment, the study estimates the economic value of specific app features. Results show that functions for immediate personal safety and family security—such as Rescue Request and Family Status Confirmation—are most highly prized. These findings lead to the conclusion that a freemium model is the most viable strategy for social implementation, offering a free version with basic features to the unreceptive majority while providing a premium, feature-rich version to the receptive minority at a sustainable price point. This dual approach can maximize public reach while ensuring financial viability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105933
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who pays for preparedness? Valuing disaster app features through a factorial survey experiment in flood-prone communities

Kohji Tanaka, Katsuya Tanaka, Tadashi Kito
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Who pays for preparedness? Valuing disaster app features through a factorial survey experiment in flood-prone communities

Kohji Tanaka, Katsuya Tanaka, Tadashi Kito
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates public preferences for next-generation disaster preparedness apps using a factorial survey experiment in flood-prone Japanese communities. The analysis first reveals a fundamental heterogeneity in public receptiveness, identifying two distinct segments: a small "receptive" minority (approx. 20%) willing to consider adoption, and a large "unreceptive" majority (approx. 80%) that rejects the app regardless of its features or price. Consequently, focusing on the receptive segment, the study estimates the economic value of specific app features. Results show that functions for immediate personal safety and family security—such as Rescue Request and Family Status Confirmation—are most highly prized. These findings lead to the conclusion that a freemium model is the most viable strategy for social implementation, offering a free version with basic features to the unreceptive majority while providing a premium, feature-rich version to the receptive minority at a sustainable price point. This dual approach can maximize public reach while ensuring financial viability.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 133
Portland State University (US), Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (JP), Institute on Governance (CA), Shiga University (JP), Fukushima Prefectural Culture Center (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who pays for preparedness? Valuing disaster app features through a factorial survey experiment in flood-prone communities — Kohji Tanaka, Katsuya Tanaka, et al. · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS