Feedback on Mental State Inferences Improves Accuracy and Awareness

Accurate inference of the mental states of others is essential for successful social interaction. Concerningly, previous work shows that humans are less accurate when inferring the views of out-group members relative to in-group members, but are unaware of this difference in accuracy. Across two studies (Experiment 1: <i>n</i> = 142; Experiment 2: <i>n</i> = 90), we asked whether feedback on the accuracy of mental state inferences could increase the accuracy of, and/or recalibrate participants' confidence in the accuracy of, mental state inferences for outgroup members. Feedback specific to individual targets significantly improved the accuracy of inferences when inferring those targets' views for both in-group and out-group members but did not generalise to other group members. Furthermore, participants were able to use feedback to calibrate their confidence in the accuracy of their out-group inferences. These results demonstrate that, with targeted feedback, people are more able to understand the minds of both in-group and out-group members and become more aware of their ability to do so.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251404419
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feedback on Mental State Inferences Improves Accuracy and Awareness

Bryony Payne, Geoffrey Bird, Caroline Catmur
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Feedback on Mental State Inferences Improves Accuracy and Awareness

Bryony Payne, Geoffrey Bird, Caroline Catmur
article en

Abstract

Accurate inference of the mental states of others is essential for successful social interaction. Concerningly, previous work shows that humans are less accurate when inferring the views of out-group members relative to in-group members, but are unaware of this difference in accuracy. Across two studies (Experiment 1: <i>n</i> = 142; Experiment 2: <i>n</i> = 90), we asked whether feedback on the accuracy of mental state inferences could increase the accuracy of, and/or recalibrate participants' confidence in the accuracy of, mental state inferences for outgroup members. Feedback specific to individual targets significantly improved the accuracy of inferences when inferring those targets' views for both in-group and out-group members but did not generalise to other group members. Furthermore, participants were able to use feedback to calibrate their confidence in the accuracy of their out-group inferences. These results demonstrate that, with targeted feedback, people are more able to understand the minds of both in-group and out-group members and become more aware of their ability to do so.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
King's College London (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Department for Education (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feedback on Mental State Inferences Improves Accuracy and Awareness — Bryony Payne, Geoffrey Bird, et al. · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS