Innovative efficient approaches to (IV) fluid administration: the role of multiple (IV) lines in enhancing flow rates

Fluid therapy is essential for maintaining circulatory homeostasis and ensuring adequate oxygen delivery to tissues during surgery and certain traumatic conditions. According to Poiseuille’s Law, flow rate is influenced by pressure gradient, tubing radius, tubing length, and fluid viscosity; however, clinical situations often necessitate the use of smaller gauge catheters (for example, 20-gauge) due to poor vein quality or limited access, which significantly reduces flow. The main goal of this study was to develop a means of improving rates of fluid resuscitation in such situations. Conventional strategies, such as high-pressure infusion devices, can increase flow but also carry risks including venous rupture and air embolism. In this laboratory-based study, we investigated whether connecting multiple IV systems to a single catheter could improve flow rates in scenarios where catheter gauge size is limited. We hypothesized that adding IV systems would improve flow rates in accordance with Poiseuille’s law. Using 16-gauge, 18-gauge, and 20-gauge catheters (internal diameter 16G (gauge) ≈1.7 mm; 18G, ≈1.3 mm; 20G, ≈1.0 mm) at three different heights (110 cm, 140 cm, 170 cm), we compared flow achieved with one, two, or three IV systems to that produced by a pressure bag set at 250 mm of mercury (millimeters of mercury (mmHg)). Our findings demonstrated that multiple IV systems significantly increased flow rates; for example, with a 20-gauge catheter at 110 cm, the flow rate increased from 38.87 mL per minute (mL/min) with a single pressured system to 45.25 mL/min using three gravity-fed systems—an improvement of approximately 16.4%. Similar enhancements were observed across other catheter sizes and heights. These results suggest that using multiple IV systems can provide a practical, lower-risk alternative to pressurized infusion for situations requiring rapid resuscitation, especially in patients with difficult access or fragile veins. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings and assess their applicability in real-world settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2025.1662229
Primary Topic
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative efficient approaches to (IV) fluid administration: the role of multiple (IV) lines in enhancing flow rates

Jason K. H. Lee, Sergio D. Bergese, Ralph Epstein, Daryn Moller et al.
Frontiers in Physics
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
article

Innovative efficient approaches to (IV) fluid administration: the role of multiple (IV) lines in enhancing flow rates

Jason K. H. Lee, Sergio D. Bergese, Ralph Epstein, Daryn Moller, Jerome Belford, Slawomir Oleszak
article en

Abstract

Fluid therapy is essential for maintaining circulatory homeostasis and ensuring adequate oxygen delivery to tissues during surgery and certain traumatic conditions. According to Poiseuille’s Law, flow rate is influenced by pressure gradient, tubing radius, tubing length, and fluid viscosity; however, clinical situations often necessitate the use of smaller gauge catheters (for example, 20-gauge) due to poor vein quality or limited access, which significantly reduces flow. The main goal of this study was to develop a means of improving rates of fluid resuscitation in such situations. Conventional strategies, such as high-pressure infusion devices, can increase flow but also carry risks including venous rupture and air embolism. In this laboratory-based study, we investigated whether connecting multiple IV systems to a single catheter could improve flow rates in scenarios where catheter gauge size is limited. We hypothesized that adding IV systems would improve flow rates in accordance with Poiseuille’s law. Using 16-gauge, 18-gauge, and 20-gauge catheters (internal diameter 16G (gauge) ≈1.7 mm; 18G, ≈1.3 mm; 20G, ≈1.0 mm) at three different heights (110 cm, 140 cm, 170 cm), we compared flow achieved with one, two, or three IV systems to that produced by a pressure bag set at 250 mm of mercury (millimeters of mercury (mmHg)). Our findings demonstrated that multiple IV systems significantly increased flow rates; for example, with a 20-gauge catheter at 110 cm, the flow rate increased from 38.87 mL per minute (mL/min) with a single pressured system to 45.25 mL/min using three gravity-fed systems—an improvement of approximately 16.4%. Similar enhancements were observed across other catheter sizes and heights. These results suggest that using multiple IV systems can provide a practical, lower-risk alternative to pressurized infusion for situations requiring rapid resuscitation, especially in patients with difficult access or fragile veins. Further clinical trials are warranted to validate these findings and assess their applicability in real-world settings.

Frontiers in PhysicsVol. 13
Stony Brook University Hospital (US), Stony Brook Medicine (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.