Communicating About and Through Platform Values: Legitimizing Public Expression Regulation on X and Weibo 2007–2024

In this article, we argue that social media platforms communicate their governance strategies both about and through values across diverse sites of communication— about values in presenting normative ideals and through values to justify their content moderation practices. Moreover, we highlight the significance of analyzing platform values across temporal and regional contexts, especially beyond the Western sphere. Focusing on X and Weibo, we employed content and network analysis to examine how they articulated values in different venues to regulate public expression from 2007 to 2024. Our findings reveal an increasing convergence in how the two platforms communicate about values in their community guidelines, suggesting a trend of institutional isomorphism in response to shared challenges such as misinformation and online safety. However, they diverged in communicating through values in administrative posts. While X emphasized personal-level values such as self-expression, Weibo prioritized social-level values, particularly social and political security, often in the context of addressing concrete cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Media + Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251395398
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communicating About and Through Platform Values: Legitimizing Public Expression Regulation on X and Weibo 2007–2024

Chris Chao Su, Лэй Гуо, Ngai Keung Chan, Tianchan Mao
Social Media + Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Communicating About and Through Platform Values: Legitimizing Public Expression Regulation on X and Weibo 2007–2024

Chris Chao Su, Лэй Гуо, Ngai Keung Chan, Tianchan Mao
article en

Abstract

In this article, we argue that social media platforms communicate their governance strategies both about and through values across diverse sites of communication— about values in presenting normative ideals and through values to justify their content moderation practices. Moreover, we highlight the significance of analyzing platform values across temporal and regional contexts, especially beyond the Western sphere. Focusing on X and Weibo, we employed content and network analysis to examine how they articulated values in different venues to regulate public expression from 2007 to 2024. Our findings reveal an increasing convergence in how the two platforms communicate about values in their community guidelines, suggesting a trend of institutional isomorphism in response to shared challenges such as misinformation and online safety. However, they diverged in communicating through values in administrative posts. While X emphasized personal-level values such as self-expression, Weibo prioritized social-level values, particularly social and political security, often in the context of addressing concrete cases.

Social Media + SocietyVol. 11(4)
Boston University (US), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Communicating About and Through Platform Values: Legitimizing Public Expression Regulation on X and Weibo 2007–2024 — Chris Chao Su, Лэй Гуо, et al. · Social Media + Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS