Electromechanical wave imaging vs electrocardiographic imaging: a direct comparison of non-invasive ventricular activation mapping modalities
Both EWI and ECGI localized the anatomical SoO in the majority of cases with site-specific advantages but also shortcomings for both modalities. EWI determines the transmural SoO which cannot be reliably localized using ECGI. ECGI has the advantage of providing mapping of multifocal and/or infrequent VA by offering panoramic single beat mapping.
Authors
- Elisa E. Konofagou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9636-7936)
- Melina Tourni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9312-0786)
- Pier D. Lambiase (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9055-9267)
- Anthony Chow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6111-0022)
- B. K. Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8838-6816)
- Joseph Hansen-Shearer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9323-1144)
- Johanna Tonko (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4689-8384)
- Meng‐Xing Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-425X)
- Aikaterini Afentouli
Institutions
- St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
- National Technical University of Athens (GR)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Columbia University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02156-y
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00