Drivers of species richness in Amazonian amphibians and reptiles: testing diversity hypotheses across taxonomic groups

Investigating the ecological drivers of species richness in the Amazon Basin enhances our understanding of the eco‐evolutionary processes shaping biodiversity across taxonomic groups. Our study investigates the roles of energy availability, water balance, and habitat heterogeneity in shaping the distribution of amphibians and reptiles by testing five ecological hypotheses: energy–environment, energy–water dynamics, productivity, metabolic theory and habitat heterogeneity. We found distinct patterns across taxa. The energy–environment hypothesis received the strongest support overall, with temperature exerting a positive effect on species richness in all groups, while potential evapotranspiration negatively impacted on Gymnophiona and snakes. The energy–water dynamics hypothesis showed moderate, taxon‐specific support, performing best for Anura, snakes, Crocodylia and Testudines. Precipitation had a positive effect across groups, whereas actual evapotranspiration had mixed impacts, with positive impacts on Anura, lizards and snakes but negatively impacting on Crocodylia and Testudines. The productivity hypothesis received weak overall support; net primary productivity positively influenced Anura and snakes but negatively affected lizards. The metabolic theory was moderately supported, with the inverse of absolute temperature (1/kT) consistently showing a negative effect across groups. The habitat heterogeneity hypothesis was generally poorly supported, except for Gymnophiona; landscape heterogeneity negatively influenced Anura, Caudata and snakes, but positive influences on the remaining taxa. Our findings highlight that, although the energy–environment hypothesis has emerged as the most robust across taxa, species richness patterns in amphibians and reptiles are best understood when considering the joint influence of energy, environment, and water availability (i.e. energy + environment + water). This integrated understanding underscores the need for conservation strategies that account for the unique ecological requirements of different taxonomic groups. Our findings highlight that sustaining biodiversity in the Amazon Basin depends primarily on the balance of energy and water dynamics, while the role of landscape heterogeneity appears to be taxon‐specific and context‐dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.11319
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers of species richness in Amazonian amphibians and reptiles: testing diversity hypotheses across taxonomic groups

Carlos Marcial López‐Rojas, Ricardo Lourenço‐de‐Moraes, Mirco Solé, Jhon Jairo López‐Rojas
1 citations
Oikos
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
1.11
article

Drivers of species richness in Amazonian amphibians and reptiles: testing diversity hypotheses across taxonomic groups

Carlos Marcial López‐Rojas, Ricardo Lourenço‐de‐Moraes, Mirco Solé, Jhon Jairo López‐Rojas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Investigating the ecological drivers of species richness in the Amazon Basin enhances our understanding of the eco‐evolutionary processes shaping biodiversity across taxonomic groups. Our study investigates the roles of energy availability, water balance, and habitat heterogeneity in shaping the distribution of amphibians and reptiles by testing five ecological hypotheses: energy–environment, energy–water dynamics, productivity, metabolic theory and habitat heterogeneity. We found distinct patterns across taxa. The energy–environment hypothesis received the strongest support overall, with temperature exerting a positive effect on species richness in all groups, while potential evapotranspiration negatively impacted on Gymnophiona and snakes. The energy–water dynamics hypothesis showed moderate, taxon‐specific support, performing best for Anura, snakes, Crocodylia and Testudines. Precipitation had a positive effect across groups, whereas actual evapotranspiration had mixed impacts, with positive impacts on Anura, lizards and snakes but negatively impacting on Crocodylia and Testudines. The productivity hypothesis received weak overall support; net primary productivity positively influenced Anura and snakes but negatively affected lizards. The metabolic theory was moderately supported, with the inverse of absolute temperature (1/kT) consistently showing a negative effect across groups. The habitat heterogeneity hypothesis was generally poorly supported, except for Gymnophiona; landscape heterogeneity negatively influenced Anura, Caudata and snakes, but positive influences on the remaining taxa. Our findings highlight that, although the energy–environment hypothesis has emerged as the most robust across taxa, species richness patterns in amphibians and reptiles are best understood when considering the joint influence of energy, environment, and water availability (i.e. energy + environment + water). This integrated understanding underscores the need for conservation strategies that account for the unique ecological requirements of different taxonomic groups. Our findings highlight that sustaining biodiversity in the Amazon Basin depends primarily on the balance of energy and water dynamics, while the role of landscape heterogeneity appears to be taxon‐specific and context‐dependent.

Oikos
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (BR), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Consortium for Sustainable Development of the Andean Ecoregion (PE), Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (DE), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.