Extending a pretrained language model (BERT) using an ontological perspective to classify students’ scientific expertise level from written responses

The complex and interdisciplinary nature of scientific concepts presents formidable challenges for students in developing their knowledge-in-use skills. The utilization of computerized analysis for evaluating students’ contextualized constructed responses offers a potential avenue for educators to develop personalized and scalable interventions, thus supporting the current teaching and learning of science. While prior research in artificial intelligence has demonstrated the effectiveness of algorithms, including Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), in tasks like automated classifications of constructed responses, these efforts have predominantly leaned towards text-level features, often overlooking the exploration of conceptual ideas embedded in students’ responses from a cognitive perspective. Despite BERT’s performance in downstream tasks, challenges may arise in domain-specific tasks, particularly in establishing knowledge connections between specialized and open domains. These challenges become pronounced in small-scale and imbalanced educational datasets, where the available information for fine-tuning is frequently inadequate to capture task-specific nuances and contextual details. The primary objective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of a pretrained language model, when integrated with an ontological framework aligned with a contextualized science assessment, in classifying students’ expertise levels in scientific explanation. Our findings indicate that while pretrained language models, such as BERT, contribute to enhanced performance in language-related tasks within educational contexts, the incorporation of identifying domain-specific terms and extracting and substituting with their associated sibling terms in sentences through ontology-based systems can significantly improve classification model performance. Further, we qualitatively examined student responses and found that, as expected, the ontology framework identified and substituted key domain-specific terms in student responses that led to more accurate predictive scores. The study explores the practical implementation of ontology in assessment evaluation to facilitate formative assessment and formulate instructional strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00149-5
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending a pretrained language model (BERT) using an ontological perspective to classify students’ scientific expertise level from written responses

Heqiao Wang, Emily A. Royse, Chelsie Romulo, Kevin C. Haudek et al.
Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

Extending a pretrained language model (BERT) using an ontological perspective to classify students’ scientific expertise level from written responses

Heqiao Wang, Emily A. Royse, Chelsie Romulo, Kevin C. Haudek, Caterina Belle Azzarello, Amanda Manzanares
article en

Abstract

The complex and interdisciplinary nature of scientific concepts presents formidable challenges for students in developing their knowledge-in-use skills. The utilization of computerized analysis for evaluating students’ contextualized constructed responses offers a potential avenue for educators to develop personalized and scalable interventions, thus supporting the current teaching and learning of science. While prior research in artificial intelligence has demonstrated the effectiveness of algorithms, including Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), in tasks like automated classifications of constructed responses, these efforts have predominantly leaned towards text-level features, often overlooking the exploration of conceptual ideas embedded in students’ responses from a cognitive perspective. Despite BERT’s performance in downstream tasks, challenges may arise in domain-specific tasks, particularly in establishing knowledge connections between specialized and open domains. These challenges become pronounced in small-scale and imbalanced educational datasets, where the available information for fine-tuning is frequently inadequate to capture task-specific nuances and contextual details. The primary objective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of a pretrained language model, when integrated with an ontological framework aligned with a contextualized science assessment, in classifying students’ expertise levels in scientific explanation. Our findings indicate that while pretrained language models, such as BERT, contribute to enhanced performance in language-related tasks within educational contexts, the incorporation of identifying domain-specific terms and extracting and substituting with their associated sibling terms in sentences through ontology-based systems can significantly improve classification model performance. Further, we qualitatively examined student responses and found that, as expected, the ontology framework identified and substituted key domain-specific terms in student responses that led to more accurate predictive scores. The study explores the practical implementation of ontology in assessment evaluation to facilitate formative assessment and formulate instructional strategies.

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education ResearchVol. 7(1)
University of Northern Colorado (US), Old Dominion University (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, University of Oxford, Directorate for STEM Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.