A global dataset of forest disturbance regimes derived from satellite biomass observations

Abstract. Forests play a central role in the global carbon cycle by serving as critical carbon sinks for atmospheric CO2. Yet, the stability and continued capacity of these sinks are increasingly threatened by a growing number of disturbances. Accurately representing the stochastic nature of disturbance remains a major challenge and a key source of uncertainty in our understanding of carbon cycle dynamics. This study presents a novel framework for deriving disturbance regimes characterized by extent (μ), frequency (α), intensity (β), as well as background mortality (Kb) directly from landscape features of high-resolution satellite biomass data. These regimes reflect the characteristics of long term disturbances at the landscape scale rather than the properties of any single event. Our analysis inverts the forward model framework developed by Wang et al. (2024), which used a machine learning model trained on a massive synthetic dataset of over 8 million forward model simulations to link known disturbance regimes to spatial biomass patterns. Instead of predicting patterns from regimes, we use observed satellite biomass patterns to infer the underlying disturbance regimes. To ensure robustness, we first identified the optimal spatial resolution for aggregating both simulation and satellite data, minimizing discrepancies in feature value ranges and reducing extrapolation risk. Using this framework, we produced the first globally consistent, observationally constrained dataset of forest disturbance regime parameters and their associated uncertainties, provided at both a 25 × 25 km2 tile level and as a gridded 0.25° global product. Additionally, we used a Dissimilarity Index (DIK) to quantify prediction uncertainty and identify potential extrapolation by measuring observations' divergence from the training set. An empirical evaluation of borderline disturbance regimes supports the assumptions and methodological approach used to build the dataset. Our global maps of disturbance regimes provide a novel, process-based tool for investigating the coupled dynamics of disturbance, vegetation, and the carbon cycle, with potential applications for improving the representation of stochastic disturbances in large-scale ecosystem models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth system science data
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-5895-2026
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A global dataset of forest disturbance regimes derived from satellite biomass observations

Ranit De, Ulrich Weber, Sujan Koirala, Maurizio Santoro et al.
Earth system science data
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

A global dataset of forest disturbance regimes derived from satellite biomass observations

Ranit De, Ulrich Weber, Sujan Koirala, Maurizio Santoro, Anna Candotti, Nuno Carvalhais, Siyuan Wang, Felix Cremer, Markus Reichstein, Matthias Forkel, Hui Yu Yang, Claire Robin
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Forests play a central role in the global carbon cycle by serving as critical carbon sinks for atmospheric CO2. Yet, the stability and continued capacity of these sinks are increasingly threatened by a growing number of disturbances. Accurately representing the stochastic nature of disturbance remains a major challenge and a key source of uncertainty in our understanding of carbon cycle dynamics. This study presents a novel framework for deriving disturbance regimes characterized by extent (μ), frequency (α), intensity (β), as well as background mortality (Kb) directly from landscape features of high-resolution satellite biomass data. These regimes reflect the characteristics of long term disturbances at the landscape scale rather than the properties of any single event. Our analysis inverts the forward model framework developed by Wang et al. (2024), which used a machine learning model trained on a massive synthetic dataset of over 8 million forward model simulations to link known disturbance regimes to spatial biomass patterns. Instead of predicting patterns from regimes, we use observed satellite biomass patterns to infer the underlying disturbance regimes. To ensure robustness, we first identified the optimal spatial resolution for aggregating both simulation and satellite data, minimizing discrepancies in feature value ranges and reducing extrapolation risk. Using this framework, we produced the first globally consistent, observationally constrained dataset of forest disturbance regime parameters and their associated uncertainties, provided at both a 25 × 25 km2 tile level and as a gridded 0.25° global product. Additionally, we used a Dissimilarity Index (DIK) to quantify prediction uncertainty and identify potential extrapolation by measuring observations' divergence from the training set. An empirical evaluation of borderline disturbance regimes supports the assumptions and methodological approach used to build the dataset. Our global maps of disturbance regimes provide a novel, process-based tool for investigating the coupled dynamics of disturbance, vegetation, and the carbon cycle, with potential applications for improving the representation of stochastic disturbances in large-scale ecosystem models.

Earth system science dataVol. 18(8)
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Peking University (CN), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), Gamma Remote Sensing (Switzerland) (CH), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology, International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering, International Max Planck Research School for global Biogeochemical Cycles
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.