China’s urban agglomerations as drivers of synergistic pollution and carbon reduction

Introduction This study investigates the impact of China’s national-level city cluster policy on the synergistic governance of urban pollution reduction and carbon reduction, focusing on both “quantity reduction” (PM2.5 and CO 2 emissions) and “efficiency improvement” (governance effectiveness). The research explores how the policy, as a quasi-natural experiment, contributes to these dual objectives. Methods Using panel data from 274 prefecture-level and above cities from 2006 to 2023, the study employs a difference-in-differences (DID) model to estimate the impacts of the policy. Additionally, mediating and moderating effect analyses are incorporated to explore the mechanisms driving the outcomes. Results The findings reveal that the city cluster policy significantly reduces PM2.5 concentrations and CO2 emissions in pilot cities, while simultaneously enhancing governance efficiency. Mechanism analysis identifies three main drivers: green technology innovation, knowledge spillovers, and industrial structure upgrading. Heterogeneity tests show that the quantitative effects (e.g., pollution reduction) are stronger in hub cities, while efficiency gains are more pronounced in non-resource-based cities. There are no significant differences between hub and non-hub cities for efficiency, and no significant impact of resource endowment on quantity reduction. Discussion This study contributes to the literature in three key ways: (1) it develops a dual-dimensional framework to assess both “quantity reduction” and “efficiency improvement” in pollution and carbon governance; (2) it uncovers the mechanisms through which the city cluster policy operates; and (3) it identifies regional heterogeneity in the policy’s effects across different types of cities. The findings underscore the dual benefits of the policy, validate the mediating mechanisms, and highlight the role of regional differences in the outcomes. Policy implications include expanding and institutionalizing the pilot programme, fostering green innovation, and tailoring city cluster development strategies to local conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1685581
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China’s urban agglomerations as drivers of synergistic pollution and carbon reduction

Ubair Nisar, Ruxiao Wang, Zainab Khalid, Fengcun Feng
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

China’s urban agglomerations as drivers of synergistic pollution and carbon reduction

Ubair Nisar, Ruxiao Wang, Zainab Khalid, Fengcun Feng
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study investigates the impact of China’s national-level city cluster policy on the synergistic governance of urban pollution reduction and carbon reduction, focusing on both “quantity reduction” (PM2.5 and CO 2 emissions) and “efficiency improvement” (governance effectiveness). The research explores how the policy, as a quasi-natural experiment, contributes to these dual objectives. Methods Using panel data from 274 prefecture-level and above cities from 2006 to 2023, the study employs a difference-in-differences (DID) model to estimate the impacts of the policy. Additionally, mediating and moderating effect analyses are incorporated to explore the mechanisms driving the outcomes. Results The findings reveal that the city cluster policy significantly reduces PM2.5 concentrations and CO2 emissions in pilot cities, while simultaneously enhancing governance efficiency. Mechanism analysis identifies three main drivers: green technology innovation, knowledge spillovers, and industrial structure upgrading. Heterogeneity tests show that the quantitative effects (e.g., pollution reduction) are stronger in hub cities, while efficiency gains are more pronounced in non-resource-based cities. There are no significant differences between hub and non-hub cities for efficiency, and no significant impact of resource endowment on quantity reduction. Discussion This study contributes to the literature in three key ways: (1) it develops a dual-dimensional framework to assess both “quantity reduction” and “efficiency improvement” in pollution and carbon governance; (2) it uncovers the mechanisms through which the city cluster policy operates; and (3) it identifies regional heterogeneity in the policy’s effects across different types of cities. The findings underscore the dual benefits of the policy, validate the mediating mechanisms, and highlight the role of regional differences in the outcomes. Policy implications include expanding and institutionalizing the pilot programme, fostering green innovation, and tailoring city cluster development strategies to local conditions.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 13
Shandong University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (IN), Jiyang College of Zhejiang A&F University (CN), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.