The environment as a second policy dimension in a deeply divided society: The politics of Northern Ireland’s Lough Neagh crisis

Environmental concerns are often marginalised in post-conflict societies. Especially under power-sharing, political parties tend to prioritise their ethno-national electoral segments’ interests, rather than co-operating across divides, reducing cross-cutting concerns to a secondary policy dimension and compromising joint policy-making. Even given inauspicious institutional incentives, however, shared priorities can encourage mass co-operation. This article analyses Northern Ireland parties’ responses to an ecological crisis at Lough Neagh, showing how they commit to its resolution rhetorically, while continuing to prioritise the interests of their distinct ethno-national segments. We demonstrate that segmental parties’ concern for the crisis is instrumental, with the second dimension of environmental policies acting primarily to serve existing interests and to crystalise political identities, compromising the policy response. These parties have outsourced responsibility for the issue of Lough Neagh to a cross-segmental party, and in so doing, we argue, have set it up to fail at the task of addressing the crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481251389426
Primary Topic
Irish and British Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The environment as a second policy dimension in a deeply divided society: The politics of Northern Ireland’s Lough Neagh crisis

E. R. Hill, Laurence Cooley, Timofey Agarin
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Irish and British Studies
article

The environment as a second policy dimension in a deeply divided society: The politics of Northern Ireland’s Lough Neagh crisis

E. R. Hill, Laurence Cooley, Timofey Agarin
article en

Abstract

Environmental concerns are often marginalised in post-conflict societies. Especially under power-sharing, political parties tend to prioritise their ethno-national electoral segments’ interests, rather than co-operating across divides, reducing cross-cutting concerns to a secondary policy dimension and compromising joint policy-making. Even given inauspicious institutional incentives, however, shared priorities can encourage mass co-operation. This article analyses Northern Ireland parties’ responses to an ecological crisis at Lough Neagh, showing how they commit to its resolution rhetorically, while continuing to prioritise the interests of their distinct ethno-national segments. We demonstrate that segmental parties’ concern for the crisis is instrumental, with the second dimension of environmental policies acting primarily to serve existing interests and to crystalise political identities, compromising the policy response. These parties have outsourced responsibility for the issue of Lough Neagh to a cross-segmental party, and in so doing, we argue, have set it up to fail at the task of addressing the crisis.

The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Irish and British Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The environment as a second policy dimension in a deeply divided society: The politics of Northern Ireland’s Lough Neagh crisis — E. R. Hill, Laurence Cooley, et al. · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS