AI Authoritarianism: Towards an Analytical Framework

ABSTRACT This intervention offers a call for investigating the deepening alignment of artificial intelligence and authoritarian politics. The paper highlights three key features of AI that inflect the workings and logics of authoritarianism: (selective) inhumanisation, the cult of intelligence and scaling. We argue that AI, through these features, is not simply extending, but actively modulating, key dynamics of authoritarianism. To account for this, we propose a flexible analytical framework designed to grapple with the rapidly changing materialisations of the confluence of AI and authoritarianism and suggest focusing on how what we call ‘authoritarian tendencies’ are introduced on the level of the techno‐material, the ideological and the everyday. The framework recognises that both AI and authoritarianism are relational practices and thus requires geographers to trace these relations across multiple sites and actors while being attentive to the ways AI and authoritarianism mutually shape one another in ever‐shifting ways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.70048
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Authoritarianism: Towards an Analytical Framework

Sophia Maalsen, Casey R. Lynch, Thomas Dekeyser
1 citations
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Geographies of human-animal interactions
6.72
article

AI Authoritarianism: Towards an Analytical Framework

Sophia Maalsen, Casey R. Lynch, Thomas Dekeyser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This intervention offers a call for investigating the deepening alignment of artificial intelligence and authoritarian politics. The paper highlights three key features of AI that inflect the workings and logics of authoritarianism: (selective) inhumanisation, the cult of intelligence and scaling. We argue that AI, through these features, is not simply extending, but actively modulating, key dynamics of authoritarianism. To account for this, we propose a flexible analytical framework designed to grapple with the rapidly changing materialisations of the confluence of AI and authoritarianism and suggest focusing on how what we call ‘authoritarian tendencies’ are introduced on the level of the techno‐material, the ideological and the everyday. The framework recognises that both AI and authoritarianism are relational practices and thus requires geographers to trace these relations across multiple sites and actors while being attentive to the ways AI and authoritarianism mutually shape one another in ever‐shifting ways.

Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
The University of Sydney (AU), Universitat de Girona (ES), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Southampton (GB)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
6.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI Authoritarianism: Towards an Analytical Framework — Sophia Maalsen, Casey R. Lynch, et al. · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS