Righting Wrongs at Home: The Potential of Domestic Judicial Remedies in Determining and Allocating Responsibility for Human Rights Violations in European Integrated Border Management

Shared administration – EU migration agencies – The European Border and Coast Guard Agency Frontex – European Integrated Border Management and responsibility gaps – Unclear division of obligations in Frontex’s mandate – EU composite legal order and limits of EU judicial remedies – National courts and the right to effective judicial protection under Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 Charter – Domestic judges as European judges – Advantages and potential of domestic remedies in multi-actor situations – Importance of preliminary references in shared administration– Domestic adjudication of human rights violations in European Integrated Border Management – Adjudication on member state responsibility – Adjudication on individual responsibility – Strengthening domestic judicial systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Constitutional Law Review
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019625100837
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Righting Wrongs at Home: The Potential of Domestic Judicial Remedies in Determining and Allocating Responsibility for Human Rights Violations in European Integrated Border Management

Salvatore Fabio Nicolosi, Elmin Omičević
European Constitutional Law Review
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Righting Wrongs at Home: The Potential of Domestic Judicial Remedies in Determining and Allocating Responsibility for Human Rights Violations in European Integrated Border Management

Salvatore Fabio Nicolosi, Elmin Omičević
article en

Abstract

Shared administration – EU migration agencies – The European Border and Coast Guard Agency Frontex – European Integrated Border Management and responsibility gaps – Unclear division of obligations in Frontex’s mandate – EU composite legal order and limits of EU judicial remedies – National courts and the right to effective judicial protection under Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 Charter – Domestic judges as European judges – Advantages and potential of domestic remedies in multi-actor situations – Importance of preliminary references in shared administration– Domestic adjudication of human rights violations in European Integrated Border Management – Adjudication on member state responsibility – Adjudication on individual responsibility – Strengthening domestic judicial systems.

European Constitutional Law ReviewVol. 21(4)
Utrecht University (NL)
Queen Mary University of London, Universitat de Barcelona
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Righting Wrongs at Home: The Potential of Domestic Judicial Remedies in Determining and Allocating Responsibility for Human Rights Violations in European Integrated Border Management — Salvatore Fabio Nicolosi, Elmin Omičević · European Constitutional Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS