The UAE’s niche diplomacy in the Middle East: authoritarian strategies of a middle power

This study analyzes how the United Arab Emirates (UAE) leverages niche diplomacy as an authoritarian middle power to expand its global influence, construct normative legitimacy, and navigate structural constraints in the international system. Focusing on high-visibility sectors, humanitarian aid, renewable energy, health, culture, and sports, the UAE converts sectoral specialization into symbolic capital, enhancing its diplomatic reach while deflecting scrutiny of its domestic governance. Rather than treating niche diplomacy as technocratic or apolitical, the study frames it as a strategic instrument of identity formation and regime legitimation. The UAE case challenges conventional international relations (IR) assumptions that associate normative influence with liberal democracies, illustrating how authoritarian states can retool soft power mechanisms for strategic gain. By addressing gaps in the literature on Middle Eastern middle powers and authoritarian diplomacy, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how non-democratic regimes shape global agendas through functional, performative, and reputational strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Security Health Science and Policy
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2025.2577421
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The UAE’s niche diplomacy in the Middle East: authoritarian strategies of a middle power

Carmela Lutmar, Mordechai Chaziza
Global Security Health Science and Policy
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

The UAE’s niche diplomacy in the Middle East: authoritarian strategies of a middle power

Carmela Lutmar, Mordechai Chaziza
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes how the United Arab Emirates (UAE) leverages niche diplomacy as an authoritarian middle power to expand its global influence, construct normative legitimacy, and navigate structural constraints in the international system. Focusing on high-visibility sectors, humanitarian aid, renewable energy, health, culture, and sports, the UAE converts sectoral specialization into symbolic capital, enhancing its diplomatic reach while deflecting scrutiny of its domestic governance. Rather than treating niche diplomacy as technocratic or apolitical, the study frames it as a strategic instrument of identity formation and regime legitimation. The UAE case challenges conventional international relations (IR) assumptions that associate normative influence with liberal democracies, illustrating how authoritarian states can retool soft power mechanisms for strategic gain. By addressing gaps in the literature on Middle Eastern middle powers and authoritarian diplomacy, the study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of how non-democratic regimes shape global agendas through functional, performative, and reputational strategies.

Global Security Health Science and PolicyVol. 10(1)
Ashkelon Academic College (IL), School of International Relations (IR), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.