Who benefits? Uncovering hidden heterogeneity of treatment effects in adaptive trials using Bayesian methods: a systematic review

The small number of simulation-based studies illustrates preliminary but promising directions for applying Bayesian methods to detect HTE in adaptive clinical trials. While these approaches demonstrate potential to enhance trial adaptability, scalability, and inclusiveness, current evidence remains limited and largely conceptual. Incorporating an equity lens into future methodological development, alongside greater emphasis on empirical validation and open science practices, will be essential to determine their practical value in advancing equitable clinical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09291-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who benefits? Uncovering hidden heterogeneity of treatment effects in adaptive trials using Bayesian methods: a systematic review

Rachel Giblon, Ewan C. Goligher, Chaochao Gao, Allen L. Pimienta et al.
1 citations
Trials
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
article

Who benefits? Uncovering hidden heterogeneity of treatment effects in adaptive trials using Bayesian methods: a systematic review

Rachel Giblon, Ewan C. Goligher, Chaochao Gao, Allen L. Pimienta, Anna Heath, Yongdong Ouyang, Jessie Cunningham, Kuan Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The small number of simulation-based studies illustrates preliminary but promising directions for applying Bayesian methods to detect HTE in adaptive clinical trials. While these approaches demonstrate potential to enhance trial adaptability, scalability, and inclusiveness, current evidence remains limited and largely conceptual. Incorporating an equity lens into future methodological development, alongside greater emphasis on empirical validation and open science practices, will be essential to determine their practical value in advancing equitable clinical research.

TrialsVol. 26(1)
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA), SickKids Foundation (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.