ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HYDRODILATATION VS INTRA-ARTICULAR CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION FOR PRIMARY ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS: A RAPID REVIEW OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS

Background: Primary adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) causes pain and restricted range of motion (ROM). Two common injection strategies are hydrodilatation (HD) and intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI), yet their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: To rapidly synthesize randomized evidence and recent reviews comparing HD versus IACI in adults with primary adhesive capsulitis, focusing on pain, ROM (especially external rotation), patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and safety. Methods: We conducted a rapid review (2018–2025) of PubMed, PubMed Central, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MA) directly comparing HD with IACI. Primary outcomes were pain (VAS/NRS) and ROM; secondary outcomes were PRO (SPADI/ASES/DASH) and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (RCTs) and a condensed AMSTAR-2 (SR/MA). We performed a narrative synthesis and reproduced pooled estimates reported in SR/MA. Results: Searches identified 72 records; 60 remained after deduplication; 6 full-texts were assessed and 6 studies were included (3 SR/MA; 3 RCTs). SR/MA suggested short-term advantages of HD—particularly for disability and external rotation—whereas head-to-head RCTs reported no added benefit of HD over IACI and, in one trial, better early outcomes with IACI alone. Longer-term differences (≥6 months) were not consistent. Adverse events were infrequent and mild. SR/MA credibility was moderate; RCTs were at some concerns or high risk of bias. Conclusions: Evidence is inconsistent; durable superiority of either HD or IACI is unproven. Practically, IACI plus structured rehabilitation is a reasonable first-line choice; image-guided HD may be reserved for selected patients with predominant stiffness or inadequate response. Standardized, well-powered RCTs with harmonized HD parameters and core outcomes are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(47).2025.3945
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HYDRODILATATION VS INTRA-ARTICULAR CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION FOR PRIMARY ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS: A RAPID REVIEW OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS

Maciej Albrzykowski, Kamil Nieroda, Olaf Jadanowski, Michalina Pastuszka et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HYDRODILATATION VS INTRA-ARTICULAR CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION FOR PRIMARY ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS: A RAPID REVIEW OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS

Maciej Albrzykowski, Kamil Nieroda, Olaf Jadanowski, Michalina Pastuszka, Piotr Misiorek, Zbigniew Klimek, Anna Albrzykowska, Mikołaj Jakubowski
article en

Abstract

Background: Primary adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) causes pain and restricted range of motion (ROM). Two common injection strategies are hydrodilatation (HD) and intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI), yet their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: To rapidly synthesize randomized evidence and recent reviews comparing HD versus IACI in adults with primary adhesive capsulitis, focusing on pain, ROM (especially external rotation), patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and safety. Methods: We conducted a rapid review (2018–2025) of PubMed, PubMed Central, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MA) directly comparing HD with IACI. Primary outcomes were pain (VAS/NRS) and ROM; secondary outcomes were PRO (SPADI/ASES/DASH) and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (RCTs) and a condensed AMSTAR-2 (SR/MA). We performed a narrative synthesis and reproduced pooled estimates reported in SR/MA. Results: Searches identified 72 records; 60 remained after deduplication; 6 full-texts were assessed and 6 studies were included (3 SR/MA; 3 RCTs). SR/MA suggested short-term advantages of HD—particularly for disability and external rotation—whereas head-to-head RCTs reported no added benefit of HD over IACI and, in one trial, better early outcomes with IACI alone. Longer-term differences (≥6 months) were not consistent. Adverse events were infrequent and mild. SR/MA credibility was moderate; RCTs were at some concerns or high risk of bias. Conclusions: Evidence is inconsistent; durable superiority of either HD or IACI is unproven. Practically, IACI plus structured rehabilitation is a reasonable first-line choice; image-guided HD may be reserved for selected patients with predominant stiffness or inadequate response. Standardized, well-powered RCTs with harmonized HD parameters and core outcomes are needed.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 6(3(47))
Medical University of Lublin (PL), Kielce University of Technology (PL), Jan Kochanowski University (PL), University of Bydgoszcz (PL), St. Raphael's Hospital (PK), Wyższej Szkoły Kadr Menedżerskich w Koninie (PL), 1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.