ULTRASOUND-GUIDED HYDRODILATATION VS INTRA-ARTICULAR CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION FOR PRIMARY ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS: A RAPID REVIEW OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS
Background: Primary adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) causes pain and restricted range of motion (ROM). Two common injection strategies are hydrodilatation (HD) and intra-articular corticosteroid injection (IACI), yet their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: To rapidly synthesize randomized evidence and recent reviews comparing HD versus IACI in adults with primary adhesive capsulitis, focusing on pain, ROM (especially external rotation), patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and safety. Methods: We conducted a rapid review (2018–2025) of PubMed, PubMed Central, Europe PMC, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SR/MA) directly comparing HD with IACI. Primary outcomes were pain (VAS/NRS) and ROM; secondary outcomes were PRO (SPADI/ASES/DASH) and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 (RCTs) and a condensed AMSTAR-2 (SR/MA). We performed a narrative synthesis and reproduced pooled estimates reported in SR/MA. Results: Searches identified 72 records; 60 remained after deduplication; 6 full-texts were assessed and 6 studies were included (3 SR/MA; 3 RCTs). SR/MA suggested short-term advantages of HD—particularly for disability and external rotation—whereas head-to-head RCTs reported no added benefit of HD over IACI and, in one trial, better early outcomes with IACI alone. Longer-term differences (≥6 months) were not consistent. Adverse events were infrequent and mild. SR/MA credibility was moderate; RCTs were at some concerns or high risk of bias. Conclusions: Evidence is inconsistent; durable superiority of either HD or IACI is unproven. Practically, IACI plus structured rehabilitation is a reasonable first-line choice; image-guided HD may be reserved for selected patients with predominant stiffness or inadequate response. Standardized, well-powered RCTs with harmonized HD parameters and core outcomes are needed.
Authors
- Maciej Albrzykowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7433-4199)
- Kamil Nieroda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0923-2630)
- Olaf Jadanowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6279-3067)
- Michalina Pastuszka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6531-5021)
- Piotr Misiorek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0106-9520)
- Zbigniew Klimek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0351-8160)
- Anna Albrzykowska (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9974-1815)
- Mikołaj Jakubowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0082-3237)
Institutions
- Medical University of Lublin (PL)
- Kielce University of Technology (PL)
- Jan Kochanowski University (PL)
- University of Bydgoszcz (PL)
- St. Raphael's Hospital (PK)
- Wyższej Szkoły Kadr Menedżerskich w Koninie (PL)
- 1 Military Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic (PL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
- Published
- 2025-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.3(47).2025.3945
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00