On the Spatial Distribution of Luminous Blue Variables, <i>B</i> [ <i>e</i> ] Supergiants, and Wolf–Rayet Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Abstract We examine the spatial distributions of luminous blue variables (LBVs), B [ e ] supergiants, and Wolf–Rayet stars (WR) stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) to clarify their relative ages, evolutionary states, and relationships. This survey employs a reference catalog that was not available for previous work, comprising more than 3900 of the LMC’s most luminous stars. Our analysis shows that LBVs, B [ e ] supergiants, and WRs have spatial distributions like normal stars with the same spectral types and luminosities. Most LBVs are not isolated, nor do they require binary or multiple status to explain their spatial relationship to other populations. There are two likely exceptions: one lower-luminosity LBV and one LBV candidate are relatively isolated and may have velocities that require additional acceleration. The B [ e ] supergiants are spatially and kinematically more dispersed than LBVs, suggesting that they belong to an older population. The most luminous early-type WNs are most closely associated with the evolved late O-type supergiants. The high luminosity late-WNs and WNh stars, however, are highly concentrated in the 30 Dor region, which biases the analysis. The less-luminous WNs and WCs are associated with a mix of evolved late-B, A-type, and yellow supergiants which may be in a post-red-supergiant phase. Spatial distributions of the less-luminous WN, WC, and WN3/O3 stars reinforce proposed evolutionary links among these subtypes. Our analysis also demonstrates the importance of using a comprehensive census, with reference populations clearly defined by spectral type and luminosity, and how small number statistics, especially when combined with spatial clustering, can invalidate some commonly cited statistical tests.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae1021
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Spatial Distribution of Luminous Blue Variables, B [ e ] Supergiants, and Wolf–Rayet Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

John C. Martin, Kris Davidson, R. M. Humphreys
3 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
3.46
article

On the Spatial Distribution of Luminous Blue Variables, B [ e ] Supergiants, and Wolf–Rayet Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

John C. Martin, Kris Davidson, R. M. Humphreys
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine the spatial distributions of luminous blue variables (LBVs), B [ e ] supergiants, and Wolf–Rayet stars (WR) stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) to clarify their relative ages, evolutionary states, and relationships. This survey employs a reference catalog that was not available for previous work, comprising more than 3900 of the LMC’s most luminous stars. Our analysis shows that LBVs, B [ e ] supergiants, and WRs have spatial distributions like normal stars with the same spectral types and luminosities. Most LBVs are not isolated, nor do they require binary or multiple status to explain their spatial relationship to other populations. There are two likely exceptions: one lower-luminosity LBV and one LBV candidate are relatively isolated and may have velocities that require additional acceleration. The B [ e ] supergiants are spatially and kinematically more dispersed than LBVs, suggesting that they belong to an older population. The most luminous early-type WNs are most closely associated with the evolved late O-type supergiants. The high luminosity late-WNs and WNh stars, however, are highly concentrated in the 30 Dor region, which biases the analysis. The less-luminous WNs and WCs are associated with a mix of evolved late-B, A-type, and yellow supergiants which may be in a post-red-supergiant phase. Spatial distributions of the less-luminous WN, WC, and WN3/O3 stars reinforce proposed evolutionary links among these subtypes. Our analysis also demonstrates the importance of using a comprehensive census, with reference populations clearly defined by spectral type and luminosity, and how small number statistics, especially when combined with spatial clustering, can invalidate some commonly cited statistical tests.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 994(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Spatial Distribution of Luminous Blue Variables, <i>B</i> [ <i>e</i> ] Supergiants, and Wolf–Rayet Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud — John C. Martin, Kris Davidson, et al. · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS