A Lack of Information About Family Health History Motivates Adopted Individuals to Pursue Elective Genomic Testing

Elective genomic testing (EGT) for medically actionable disease predispositions may help adopted individuals (adoptees) with limited knowledge of family health history (FHH) information understand their inherited risks. In this prospective cohort study, patients who participated in Sanford Health's EGT program were surveyed at the time of enrollment between August 2020 and April 2022 about their motivations for pursuing EGT and perceived risks for three conditions. Data from self-reported adoptees and nonadoptees were analyzed using bivariate analyses. Of the 5799 eligible patients, 197 (3.4%) reported that they were adopted. Adoptees were more likely than nonadoptees to report lack of information about FHH as a very important motivation for pursuing EGT (81% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to rate it as their most important motivation (45% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Other motivations, including learning about personal disease risk (72% vs. 61%; p = 0.016) and providing disease risk information to children (69% vs. 57%; p = 0.003), were also more likely to be rated as very important by adoptees than by nonadoptees, respectively. No differences in risk perceptions were observed. A lack of FHH information is an important reason why adoptees pursue EGT. Adoptees may hope that EGT will identify inherited risks for disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmga.70005
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Lack of Information About Family Health History Motivates Adopted Individuals to Pursue Elective Genomic Testing

Hadley Stevens Smith, Dylan Platt, Catherine Hajek, Madison R. Hickingbotham et al.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

A Lack of Information About Family Health History Motivates Adopted Individuals to Pursue Elective Genomic Testing

Hadley Stevens Smith, Dylan Platt, Catherine Hajek, Madison R. Hickingbotham, Jennifer Leonhard, Kurt D. Christensen, Megan Bell, Emilie S. Zoltick, Robert C. Green
article en

Abstract

Elective genomic testing (EGT) for medically actionable disease predispositions may help adopted individuals (adoptees) with limited knowledge of family health history (FHH) information understand their inherited risks. In this prospective cohort study, patients who participated in Sanford Health's EGT program were surveyed at the time of enrollment between August 2020 and April 2022 about their motivations for pursuing EGT and perceived risks for three conditions. Data from self-reported adoptees and nonadoptees were analyzed using bivariate analyses. Of the 5799 eligible patients, 197 (3.4%) reported that they were adopted. Adoptees were more likely than nonadoptees to report lack of information about FHH as a very important motivation for pursuing EGT (81% vs. 32%, p < 0.001) and were more likely to rate it as their most important motivation (45% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Other motivations, including learning about personal disease risk (72% vs. 61%; p = 0.016) and providing disease risk information to children (69% vs. 57%; p = 0.003), were also more likely to be rated as very important by adoptees than by nonadoptees, respectively. No differences in risk perceptions were observed. A lack of FHH information is an important reason why adoptees pursue EGT. Adoptees may hope that EGT will identify inherited risks for disease.

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part AVol. 200(4)
Broad Institute (US), Sanford Health (US), Harvard University (US), Augustana University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US), Ariadne Diagnostics (United States) (US), Helix (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.