Lost in the FoG: Pitfalls of Models for Large-scale Hydrogen Distributions

Abstract Large-scale H i surveys and their cross correlations with galaxy distributions have immense potential as cosmological probes. Interpreting these measurements requires theoretical models that must incorporate redshift-space distortions (RSDs), such as the Kaiser and fingers-of-God (FoG) effect, and differences in the tracer and matter distributions via the tracer bias. These effects are commonly approximated with assumptions that should be tested on simulated distributions. In this work, we use the hydrodynamical simulation suite IllustrisTNG to assess the performance of models of z ≤ 1 H i autopower and H i -galaxy cross-power spectra, finding that the models employed by recent observations introduce errors comparable to or exceeding their measurement uncertainties. In particular, neglecting FoG causes ≳10% deviations between the modeled and simulated power spectra at k ≳ 0.1 h cMpc −1 , larger than assuming a constant bias that reaches the same error threshold at slightly smaller scales. However, even without these assumptions, models can still err by ∼10% on observationally relevant scales. These remaining errors arise from multiple RSD damping sources on H i clustering, which are not sufficiently described with a single FoG term. Overall, our results highlight the need for an improved understanding of RSDs to harness the capabilities of future measurements of H i distributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae0e69
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in the FoG: Pitfalls of Models for Large-scale Hydrogen Distributions

Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Calvin Osinga, Benedikt Diemer
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Lost in the FoG: Pitfalls of Models for Large-scale Hydrogen Distributions

Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Calvin Osinga, Benedikt Diemer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Large-scale H i surveys and their cross correlations with galaxy distributions have immense potential as cosmological probes. Interpreting these measurements requires theoretical models that must incorporate redshift-space distortions (RSDs), such as the Kaiser and fingers-of-God (FoG) effect, and differences in the tracer and matter distributions via the tracer bias. These effects are commonly approximated with assumptions that should be tested on simulated distributions. In this work, we use the hydrodynamical simulation suite IllustrisTNG to assess the performance of models of z ≤ 1 H i autopower and H i -galaxy cross-power spectra, finding that the models employed by recent observations introduce errors comparable to or exceeding their measurement uncertainties. In particular, neglecting FoG causes ≳10% deviations between the modeled and simulated power spectra at k ≳ 0.1 h cMpc −1 , larger than assuming a constant bias that reaches the same error threshold at slightly smaller scales. However, even without these assumptions, models can still err by ∼10% on observationally relevant scales. These remaining errors arise from multiple RSD damping sources on H i clustering, which are not sufficiently described with a single FoG term. Overall, our results highlight the need for an improved understanding of RSDs to harness the capabilities of future measurements of H i distributions.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 994(2)
Flatiron Health (United States) (US), Flatiron Institute (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lost in the FoG: Pitfalls of Models for Large-scale Hydrogen Distributions — Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro, Calvin Osinga, et al. · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS