Restoring streams, reshaping work: insights from Participatory Action Research in informal urban areas

Abstract Introduction Urban streams are often part of peripheral settlements, commonly trapped in negative social–ecological feedback, undermining habitat health and ecosystem resilience. Disrupting this loop requires integrating ecological rehabilitation approaches that actively engage local communities. Objectives This study aims to advance the ecological rehabilitation of urban streams exploring how Participatory Action Research (PAR) can co‐produce ecological and social innovations that inform inclusive restoration policies in vulnerable urban settings. Methods Together with workers of a grassroots organization who are beneficiaries of a national social employment program, we conducted three co‐production cycles to adapt, install, and test planted rolls. Furthermore, a factorial experiment tested the development of four native species ( Typha latifolia , Schoenoplectus californicus , Thalia multiflora , and Equisetum giganteum ) in pre‐soaked versus unsoaked sawdust substrates. Plant development was co‐monitored over 100 days, and field survival for 1 year. Growth and T 50 were estimated with mixed‐effects models (Conway–Maxwell–Poisson and zero‐inflated gamma) and establishment was evaluated via survival analysis. Results Implementation of a shared workbook and data collection yielded a standardized plant‐roll protocol and enabled participatory learning. Rooting time ( T 50 ) strongly predicted in‐stream plant establishment: T. multiflora rooted earliest (36.4 days) and achieved the highest survival; S. californicus and T. latifolia rooted similarly (≈77 days) but differed in allocation— S. californicus showed early foliar growth and lower survival, while T. latifolia had better establishment. Equisetum giganteum was poorly suited to the rolls. Conclusions The PAR approach enabled co‐production of ecological and social innovations, linking species performance with community learning and generating actionable knowledge to inform inclusive, labor‐based restoration policies in vulnerable urban areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70269
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restoring streams, reshaping work: insights from Participatory Action Research in informal urban areas

Sebastián Gómez Lugo, Bárbara M. Gómez, Martín Graziano
Restoration Ecology
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Restoring streams, reshaping work: insights from Participatory Action Research in informal urban areas

Sebastián Gómez Lugo, Bárbara M. Gómez, Martín Graziano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Urban streams are often part of peripheral settlements, commonly trapped in negative social–ecological feedback, undermining habitat health and ecosystem resilience. Disrupting this loop requires integrating ecological rehabilitation approaches that actively engage local communities. Objectives This study aims to advance the ecological rehabilitation of urban streams exploring how Participatory Action Research (PAR) can co‐produce ecological and social innovations that inform inclusive restoration policies in vulnerable urban settings. Methods Together with workers of a grassroots organization who are beneficiaries of a national social employment program, we conducted three co‐production cycles to adapt, install, and test planted rolls. Furthermore, a factorial experiment tested the development of four native species ( Typha latifolia , Schoenoplectus californicus , Thalia multiflora , and Equisetum giganteum ) in pre‐soaked versus unsoaked sawdust substrates. Plant development was co‐monitored over 100 days, and field survival for 1 year. Growth and T 50 were estimated with mixed‐effects models (Conway–Maxwell–Poisson and zero‐inflated gamma) and establishment was evaluated via survival analysis. Results Implementation of a shared workbook and data collection yielded a standardized plant‐roll protocol and enabled participatory learning. Rooting time ( T 50 ) strongly predicted in‐stream plant establishment: T. multiflora rooted earliest (36.4 days) and achieved the highest survival; S. californicus and T. latifolia rooted similarly (≈77 days) but differed in allocation— S. californicus showed early foliar growth and lower survival, while T. latifolia had better establishment. Equisetum giganteum was poorly suited to the rolls. Conclusions The PAR approach enabled co‐production of ecological and social innovations, linking species performance with community learning and generating actionable knowledge to inform inclusive, labor‐based restoration policies in vulnerable urban areas.

Restoration EcologyVol. 34(3)
Instituto Nacional del Agua (AR), Fundación Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.