Low-Cost, High-Accuracy Reactivity Modeling: Integrating Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning with Multilevel DFT Calculations
Accurate prediction of Gibbs activation energies (Δ<i>G</i><sup>‡</sup>) for Diels-Alder (DA) reactions remains a critical challenge in computational chemistry, as conventional density functional theory (DFT) methods often fail to consistently achieve chemical accuracy (<1 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup>). In this work, we demonstrate that no single method reliably meets this threshold through a systematic evaluation of 720 DFT approaches across 24 DA reactions. Here, we introduce a proof-of-concept framework that integrates a genetic algorithm and machine learning (GA-ML) to intelligently select cost-effective, multilevel DFT combinations. Our optimized GA1 model identified four low-cost DFT combinations that yield Δ<i>G</i><sup>‡</sup> predictions with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.4 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> in both training and external validation sets, matching the accuracy of high-level CCSD(T) calculations at a fraction of the computational cost. To further enhance adaptability, we introduce Dynamic Generalization-Driven Transfer Learning (DGDTL), a novel method that adaptively optimizes linear coefficients, ensuring robust predictions for both known and unseen reactions. The integration of GA-ML and DGDTL establishes a scalable, high-fidelity paradigm for reactivity prediction, with potential applications in catalysis, drug design, and materials science.
Authors
- María Marta Zanardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-5358)
- Ariel M. Sarotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8151-0306)
- J. A. Pérez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3889-3495)
Institutions
- Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina (AR)
- National University of Rosario (AR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
- Published
- 2025-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c02048
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.52