How high? Identifying elevation thresholds to guide coastal marsh restoration

Abstract Introduction Coastal marshes are highly valuable ecosystems facing threats from rising sea levels and intensifying storm events. To elevate marsh surfaces and prevent loss of ecosystem services, the beneficial use of dredged material (BUDM) is increasingly being implemented across the United States. Objectives The objective of this study was to aid decision‐makers and restoration practitioners by identifying elevation thresholds that control the optimal function of Spartina patens ‐dominated marshes along the Texas Coast. Methods This study was conducted in the coastal marshes of the J.D. Murphree Wildlife Management Area (Texas). We collected elevation and vegetation cover data along ecological transition zones in marshes nourished with BUDM to identify elevation thresholds that define zones of optimal plant survivorship and growth. Results We identified lower (−0.05 m mean high water, MHW) and upper (0.26 m MHW) elevation thresholds that defined transitions to open water and unvegetated bare ground, respectively. Elevation targets ( T ) and elevation target zones, which defined areas with the greatest vegetation cover, were determined for S. patens ( T : 0.11 m, target zone: −0.06 to 0.26 m MHW), S. alterniflora ( T : 0.00 m, target zone: −0.12 to 0.10 m MHW), and Distichlis spicata ( T : 0.17 m, target zone: 0.07–0.25 m MHW). Conclusions Our analyses provide species‐specific elevation targets for coastal marsh restoration through BUDM, which can improve restoration outcomes for coastal wetlands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70232
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How high? Identifying elevation thresholds to guide coastal marsh restoration

Camille L. Stagg, Todd Merendino, Jena A. Moon, Rachel Villani et al.
Restoration Ecology
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

How high? Identifying elevation thresholds to guide coastal marsh restoration

Camille L. Stagg, Todd Merendino, Jena A. Moon, Rachel Villani, Navid H. Jafari, Colt R. Sanspree, Jack A. Cadigan, Nia Hurst, Omar Alawneh, Matt Nelson, Brian D. Harris, Michael J. Osland, Michael Rezsutek, Emily Fromenthal, Daniel Gallegos, Philip Pauling, Taylor Abshier
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Coastal marshes are highly valuable ecosystems facing threats from rising sea levels and intensifying storm events. To elevate marsh surfaces and prevent loss of ecosystem services, the beneficial use of dredged material (BUDM) is increasingly being implemented across the United States. Objectives The objective of this study was to aid decision‐makers and restoration practitioners by identifying elevation thresholds that control the optimal function of Spartina patens ‐dominated marshes along the Texas Coast. Methods This study was conducted in the coastal marshes of the J.D. Murphree Wildlife Management Area (Texas). We collected elevation and vegetation cover data along ecological transition zones in marshes nourished with BUDM to identify elevation thresholds that define zones of optimal plant survivorship and growth. Results We identified lower (−0.05 m mean high water, MHW) and upper (0.26 m MHW) elevation thresholds that defined transitions to open water and unvegetated bare ground, respectively. Elevation targets ( T ) and elevation target zones, which defined areas with the greatest vegetation cover, were determined for S. patens ( T : 0.11 m, target zone: −0.06 to 0.26 m MHW), S. alterniflora ( T : 0.00 m, target zone: −0.12 to 0.10 m MHW), and Distichlis spicata ( T : 0.17 m, target zone: 0.07–0.25 m MHW). Conclusions Our analyses provide species‐specific elevation targets for coastal marsh restoration through BUDM, which can improve restoration outcomes for coastal wetlands.

Restoration EcologyVol. 34(1)
United States Geological Survey (US), United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Cherokee Nation (US), Ducks Unlimited (US), U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US), Texas A&M University (US)
China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, U.S. Geological Survey, South Central Climate Adaptation Science Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.