A comparative study of artificial neural network with pattern search algorithm and response surface methodology for multi-objective optimization of dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties in PLA-based fused filament fabrication

In additive manufacturing, the optimisation of process parameters to simultaneously enhance both mechanical and geometrical properties remains a significant challenge. This study presents a comparative analysis between two distinct approaches to multi-response optimisation: a hybrid method combining Artificial Neural Networks with Pattern Search Algorithm, and the traditional Response Surface Methodology. Both methods were applied to optimise the process parameters of Fused Filament Fabrication using Polylactic Acid. The hybrid ANN + PSA model was used to predict process outputs and optimise printing parameters, while RSM employed a statistical approach to identify optimal parameter combinations through designed experiments. Results show that ANN + PSA achieved better outcomes with a maximum tensile strength of 61.88 MPa and dimensional deviations within 3%, compared to RSM's tensile strength of 53.05 MPa and deviations up to 4%. The ANN + PSA model demonstrated higher predictive accuracy with an R 2 of 94.34% during training and 91.34% during evaluation, versus RSM’s R 2 of 90.5% for tensile strength prediction. Additionally, ANN + PSA consistently required fewer experimental trials due to its integration with the Pattern Search Algorithm, improving computational efficiency. The findings demonstrate that ANN + PSA is computationally efficient for scenarios with fewer experimental trials, while RSM offers a more detailed understanding of interaction effects. The comparative insights from this study contribute to enhanced multi-response optimisation strategies in additive manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054251395156
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of artificial neural network with pattern search algorithm and response surface methodology for multi-objective optimization of dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties in PLA-based fused filament fabrication

Valentina Vendittoli, Wilma Polini, Michael S. J. Walter
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

A comparative study of artificial neural network with pattern search algorithm and response surface methodology for multi-objective optimization of dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties in PLA-based fused filament fabrication

Valentina Vendittoli, Wilma Polini, Michael S. J. Walter
article en

Abstract

In additive manufacturing, the optimisation of process parameters to simultaneously enhance both mechanical and geometrical properties remains a significant challenge. This study presents a comparative analysis between two distinct approaches to multi-response optimisation: a hybrid method combining Artificial Neural Networks with Pattern Search Algorithm, and the traditional Response Surface Methodology. Both methods were applied to optimise the process parameters of Fused Filament Fabrication using Polylactic Acid. The hybrid ANN + PSA model was used to predict process outputs and optimise printing parameters, while RSM employed a statistical approach to identify optimal parameter combinations through designed experiments. Results show that ANN + PSA achieved better outcomes with a maximum tensile strength of 61.88 MPa and dimensional deviations within 3%, compared to RSM's tensile strength of 53.05 MPa and deviations up to 4%. The ANN + PSA model demonstrated higher predictive accuracy with an R 2 of 94.34% during training and 91.34% during evaluation, versus RSM’s R 2 of 90.5% for tensile strength prediction. Additionally, ANN + PSA consistently required fewer experimental trials due to its integration with the Pattern Search Algorithm, improving computational efficiency. The findings demonstrate that ANN + PSA is computationally efficient for scenarios with fewer experimental trials, while RSM offers a more detailed understanding of interaction effects. The comparative insights from this study contribute to enhanced multi-response optimisation strategies in additive manufacturing.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture
Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), Ansbach University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.