Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Micro-endoscopic Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multiple Lumbar Spine Scoring Systems

Conventional outcome scores capture important but incomplete aspects of recovery after MEL. Incorporating a brief, patient-reported satisfaction measure alongside established instruments can provide a more balanced appraisal of outcomes and support shared decision-making. Prospective studies are warranted to refine how satisfaction is integrated into routine evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.97630
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Micro-endoscopic Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multiple Lumbar Spine Scoring Systems

Kimitaka Nakamura, Ryuta Imamura, Akihiko Inokuchi, Kohei Tsukahara et al.
Cureus
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Micro-endoscopic Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multiple Lumbar Spine Scoring Systems

Kimitaka Nakamura, Ryuta Imamura, Akihiko Inokuchi, Kohei Tsukahara, Takeshi Arizono, Takahiro Hamada, Shohei Yamada, Keigo Shirasaki, Teiyu Izumi, M Yamashita
article en

Abstract

Conventional outcome scores capture important but incomplete aspects of recovery after MEL. Incorporating a brief, patient-reported satisfaction measure alongside established instruments can provide a more balanced appraisal of outcomes and support shared decision-making. Prospective studies are warranted to refine how satisfaction is integrated into routine evaluation.

CureusVol. 17(11)
Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.