Comprehensive Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Platform for Decentralized Primary Healthcare: Ensuring Analytical Quality Through Central Laboratory Oversight

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Point-of-care testing (POCT) is increasingly adopted in primary healthcare to facilitate rapid screening and monitoring of chronic conditions. Ensuring that its analytical quality is comparable to central laboratory testing is crucial for safe and effective implementation. This study aims to rigorously evaluate the analytical performance of the Allegro POCT system against established central laboratory reference methods to determine its suitability for decentralized healthcare settings. <b>Methods:</b> We assessed the correlation, concordance, and bias of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose (GLUC), total cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides (TRIG), creatinine (CREA), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Using a cohort of 100 residual patient samples, measurements from the Allegro POCT system were compared against reference methods on the Atellica CH 930 Analyzer and TOSOH G8 system. The statistical analysis was performed using Deming regression, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson correlation. <b>Results:</b> HbA1c and GLUC demonstrated strong linearity and correlation (Pearson's r = 0.9863 and r = 0.9994, respectively). A slight positive bias was noted for HbA1c at higher concentrations. In the lipid panel, CHOL showed a significant positive bias (mean bias +14.2 mg/dL), while TRIG exhibited a substantial negative bias (mean bias -37.0 mg/dL) and wide limits of agreement. HDL and CREA showed good linearity but only moderate agreement. CRP demonstrated excellent concordance with the reference method (Pearson's r = 0.9955) and minimal bias. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Allegro system exhibits acceptable analytical performance for GLUC and CRP, rendering it suitable for decentralized use. HbA1c and CREA performance is adequate, though caution is advised due to observed biases. However, the significant biases for CHOL and TRIG underscore the indispensable role of central laboratory oversight in any POCT program. Rigorous initial validation and continuous quality monitoring under a robust governance framework are essential to ensure the reliability and clinical utility of POCT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15232977
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Platform for Decentralized Primary Healthcare: Ensuring Analytical Quality Through Central Laboratory Oversight

Francesca Alcaro, Giacomo Moretti, Luigi Colacicco, Andrea Urbani
Diagnostics
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Comprehensive Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Platform for Decentralized Primary Healthcare: Ensuring Analytical Quality Through Central Laboratory Oversight

Francesca Alcaro, Giacomo Moretti, Luigi Colacicco, Andrea Urbani
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Point-of-care testing (POCT) is increasingly adopted in primary healthcare to facilitate rapid screening and monitoring of chronic conditions. Ensuring that its analytical quality is comparable to central laboratory testing is crucial for safe and effective implementation. This study aims to rigorously evaluate the analytical performance of the Allegro POCT system against established central laboratory reference methods to determine its suitability for decentralized healthcare settings. <b>Methods:</b> We assessed the correlation, concordance, and bias of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), glucose (GLUC), total cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), triglycerides (TRIG), creatinine (CREA), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Using a cohort of 100 residual patient samples, measurements from the Allegro POCT system were compared against reference methods on the Atellica CH 930 Analyzer and TOSOH G8 system. The statistical analysis was performed using Deming regression, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson correlation. <b>Results:</b> HbA1c and GLUC demonstrated strong linearity and correlation (Pearson's r = 0.9863 and r = 0.9994, respectively). A slight positive bias was noted for HbA1c at higher concentrations. In the lipid panel, CHOL showed a significant positive bias (mean bias +14.2 mg/dL), while TRIG exhibited a substantial negative bias (mean bias -37.0 mg/dL) and wide limits of agreement. HDL and CREA showed good linearity but only moderate agreement. CRP demonstrated excellent concordance with the reference method (Pearson's r = 0.9955) and minimal bias. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Allegro system exhibits acceptable analytical performance for GLUC and CRP, rendering it suitable for decentralized use. HbA1c and CREA performance is adequate, though caution is advised due to observed biases. However, the significant biases for CHOL and TRIG underscore the indispensable role of central laboratory oversight in any POCT program. Rigorous initial validation and continuous quality monitoring under a robust governance framework are essential to ensure the reliability and clinical utility of POCT.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(23)
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), University of the Sacred Heart (JP), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.