Intuitive web tools for reference interval estimation: goCrunch and ReferenceRangeR

Abstract Objectives Verification of reference intervals (RIs) is mandatory for clinical laboratories. In this context indirect methods of RI estimation may be of assistance, yet these are often limited to experts with programming or statistical skills due to the lack of standardized solutions in laboratory information systems. Methods This study evaluates two web-based platforms, goCrunch and ReferenceRangeR, developed to simplify RI estimation with indirect methods for laboratory professionals without requiring expertise in R or other statistical software. RIs estimated from real-world platelet and anion gap datasets were compared across the platforms. Results The platforms were assessed regarding data handling, statistical methods, visualization, and quality assurance. goCrunch supports both classical (Hoffmann, Bhattacharya) and modern methods (refineR, reflimR), with options for filtering, transformation, verification, and graphical outputs. ReferenceRangeR focuses on newer methods (refineR, TML, TMC, kosmic, reflimR) and includes additional features such as stratification by age and sex, age-drift detection, and RI comparison against external values. The comparison of a simple analyte (platelet count) and a complex one (anion gap) highlighted the strengths and limitations of each platform. Conclusions Both tools enable efficient RI generation and verification with minimal user intervention. While goCrunch is particularly suitable for routine applications and educational purposes, ReferenceRangeR provides enhanced analytical and comparative functionalities, thereby both tools support laboratories in meeting accreditation requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2025-0244
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intuitive web tools for reference interval estimation: goCrunch and ReferenceRangeR

Gunnar Brandhorst, Maike Voss, Fatma Demet Arslan, Christopher‐John L. Farrell et al.
Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Intuitive web tools for reference interval estimation: goCrunch and ReferenceRangeR

Gunnar Brandhorst, Maike Voss, Fatma Demet Arslan, Christopher‐John L. Farrell, Ayşe YAZICI
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Verification of reference intervals (RIs) is mandatory for clinical laboratories. In this context indirect methods of RI estimation may be of assistance, yet these are often limited to experts with programming or statistical skills due to the lack of standardized solutions in laboratory information systems. Methods This study evaluates two web-based platforms, goCrunch and ReferenceRangeR, developed to simplify RI estimation with indirect methods for laboratory professionals without requiring expertise in R or other statistical software. RIs estimated from real-world platelet and anion gap datasets were compared across the platforms. Results The platforms were assessed regarding data handling, statistical methods, visualization, and quality assurance. goCrunch supports both classical (Hoffmann, Bhattacharya) and modern methods (refineR, reflimR), with options for filtering, transformation, verification, and graphical outputs. ReferenceRangeR focuses on newer methods (refineR, TML, TMC, kosmic, reflimR) and includes additional features such as stratification by age and sex, age-drift detection, and RI comparison against external values. The comparison of a simple analyte (platelet count) and a complex one (anion gap) highlighted the strengths and limitations of each platform. Conclusions Both tools enable efficient RI generation and verification with minimal user intervention. While goCrunch is particularly suitable for routine applications and educational purposes, ReferenceRangeR provides enhanced analytical and comparative functionalities, thereby both tools support laboratories in meeting accreditation requirements.

Journal of Laboratory MedicineVol. 49(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), Izmir University (TR), Bakırçay Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.