Management of Pan Facial Fractures: Operative Staging and Overall Complications

Background: Pan facial fractures (PFF), which involve the upper, midface, and lower facial skeleton, are a severe and complex subset of maxillofacial trauma. While the optimal management of PFFs often emphasizes strategic operative sequencing (eg, top-down vs bottom-up approaches), the clinical implications of surgical staging (single-stage vs multi-staged repair) remain less thoroughly investigated. This study aims to evaluate and compare outcomes associated with single-stage versus multi-staged operative repair of PFF. Methods: A retrospective cohort review was conducted at a Level I trauma center from 2018 to 2019. Adult patients with fractures involving at least 3 facial subunits were included. Data on fracture patterns, surgical timing, duration of initial surgery and postoperative complications were collected. Outcomes were stratified by operative strategy (single-stage vs staged). Results: Of the 50 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 78% (n = 39) necessitated operative intervention. 64% (n = 33) underwent single-stage repair, while 12% (n = 6) received planned, multi-staged reconstruction. Staged procedures were predominantly indicated for PFF patients presenting with highly complex fracture patterns, specifically mixed-pattern Le Fort fractures, extensive zygomaticomaxillary complex injuries, and concomitant orbital floor and medial wall defects. Overall, 28% (n = 14) of the total patient cohort experienced major postoperative complications. No mortalities were reported. Multi-staged repairs were associated with a higher incidence of infection, enophthalmos, and hematoma. However, these patients exhibited greater injury severity at presentation, suggesting a potential selection bias. Conclusion: Single-stage reconstruction remains the preferred approach for Pan facial fractures (PFFs) in most clinical scenario. Nevertheless, staged reconstruction is a valuable alternative, particularly in managing extensive pan facial fracture patterns within the context of a polytrauma patient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACE
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016251387242
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of Pan Facial Fractures: Operative Staging and Overall Complications

Bashar Hassan, Jeison De Guzman, Apanjit Sahi, EDWARD J. RESNICK et al.
FACE
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Management of Pan Facial Fractures: Operative Staging and Overall Complications

Bashar Hassan, Jeison De Guzman, Apanjit Sahi, EDWARD J. RESNICK, Pharibe Pope, Darius Balumuka, Michael P. Grant, Seray Er, Robin Yang, Grishma Patel
article en

Abstract

Background: Pan facial fractures (PFF), which involve the upper, midface, and lower facial skeleton, are a severe and complex subset of maxillofacial trauma. While the optimal management of PFFs often emphasizes strategic operative sequencing (eg, top-down vs bottom-up approaches), the clinical implications of surgical staging (single-stage vs multi-staged repair) remain less thoroughly investigated. This study aims to evaluate and compare outcomes associated with single-stage versus multi-staged operative repair of PFF. Methods: A retrospective cohort review was conducted at a Level I trauma center from 2018 to 2019. Adult patients with fractures involving at least 3 facial subunits were included. Data on fracture patterns, surgical timing, duration of initial surgery and postoperative complications were collected. Outcomes were stratified by operative strategy (single-stage vs staged). Results: Of the 50 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 78% (n = 39) necessitated operative intervention. 64% (n = 33) underwent single-stage repair, while 12% (n = 6) received planned, multi-staged reconstruction. Staged procedures were predominantly indicated for PFF patients presenting with highly complex fracture patterns, specifically mixed-pattern Le Fort fractures, extensive zygomaticomaxillary complex injuries, and concomitant orbital floor and medial wall defects. Overall, 28% (n = 14) of the total patient cohort experienced major postoperative complications. No mortalities were reported. Multi-staged repairs were associated with a higher incidence of infection, enophthalmos, and hematoma. However, these patients exhibited greater injury severity at presentation, suggesting a potential selection bias. Conclusion: Single-stage reconstruction remains the preferred approach for Pan facial fractures (PFFs) in most clinical scenario. Nevertheless, staged reconstruction is a valuable alternative, particularly in managing extensive pan facial fracture patterns within the context of a polytrauma patient.

FACEVol. 7(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.