Exploring university student perspectives of a challenge‐based curriculum

Abstract The world faces multiple global and local challenges, with some describing one challenge, climate breakdown, as an existential threat. Publications in this journal have highlighted the importance of curricula that help students better understand and address these challenges. Delivering more challenge‐based learning experiences may require changes at multiple levels, but as an initial step, this research gathered preliminary data as part of an aspirational co‐design process. Importantly, students were a key part of the research team as co‐researchers, and data were collected from student participants. Using mixed methods, the study explored: (i) how important students feel specific challenges are; (ii) if they feel their current curricula help them navigate these challenges; (iii) whether they would like to have optional challenge‐based learning; and (iv) how this learning could be delivered. In more detail, 61 students from one UK university rated and commented on 30 challenges from existing peer‐reviewed research. While all 30 challenges were, on average, rated as important, the challenges rated as most important concerned: (i) mental health and well‐being; (ii) prejudice, intolerance, and inequality; and (iii) the climate and wider ecological emergencies. However, students were less sure that their current curricula helped them understand and tackle these challenges, and so, perhaps understandably, wanted further learning opportunities. Qualitative data showed a wide variety of views on what format this additional learning should take—but little to no consensus. The discussion considers the tensions inherent in these results, especially in terms of addressing power and politics, and potential issues this may pose both for students and universities operating in an increasingly market‐led and polarised environment. The paper concludes with four tentative recommendations for researchers, funders, leaders, policymakers, and parliamentarians who seek to make a more challenge‐based curriculum a reality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Curriculum Journal
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.70013
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring university student perspectives of a challenge‐based curriculum

Miles Thompson, Rashea Hamilton, Alpesh Maisuria, Shona McCartney
The Curriculum Journal
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Exploring university student perspectives of a challenge‐based curriculum

Miles Thompson, Rashea Hamilton, Alpesh Maisuria, Shona McCartney
article en

Abstract

Abstract The world faces multiple global and local challenges, with some describing one challenge, climate breakdown, as an existential threat. Publications in this journal have highlighted the importance of curricula that help students better understand and address these challenges. Delivering more challenge‐based learning experiences may require changes at multiple levels, but as an initial step, this research gathered preliminary data as part of an aspirational co‐design process. Importantly, students were a key part of the research team as co‐researchers, and data were collected from student participants. Using mixed methods, the study explored: (i) how important students feel specific challenges are; (ii) if they feel their current curricula help them navigate these challenges; (iii) whether they would like to have optional challenge‐based learning; and (iv) how this learning could be delivered. In more detail, 61 students from one UK university rated and commented on 30 challenges from existing peer‐reviewed research. While all 30 challenges were, on average, rated as important, the challenges rated as most important concerned: (i) mental health and well‐being; (ii) prejudice, intolerance, and inequality; and (iii) the climate and wider ecological emergencies. However, students were less sure that their current curricula helped them understand and tackle these challenges, and so, perhaps understandably, wanted further learning opportunities. Qualitative data showed a wide variety of views on what format this additional learning should take—but little to no consensus. The discussion considers the tensions inherent in these results, especially in terms of addressing power and politics, and potential issues this may pose both for students and universities operating in an increasingly market‐led and polarised environment. The paper concludes with four tentative recommendations for researchers, funders, leaders, policymakers, and parliamentarians who seek to make a more challenge‐based curriculum a reality.

The Curriculum Journal
University of the West of England (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Education and Early Childhood Development (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.