Affordances of Wartime Collective Action on Facebook

This paper relies on the conceptual framework of affordances to study collective action, focusing on the under-researched area of wartime collective efforts. Using the case study of collective action during the war in Ukraine, the paper analyses a sample of the most successful Facebook profiles engaging in collective action to support the military and humanitarian efforts in Ukraine and uncovers the various approaches to the organisation of collective action. The paper explores the common features and differences between activists, including approaches to presentation, user engagement, interaction, and reporting. Two groups of profiles are identified based on how they actualise Facebook affordances: organisational and individual profiles. The two groups were found to clearly differ in their approach to user engagement, posting patterns and the use of specific Facebook functions. The findings have implications regarding the organisation of collective initiatives by different actors and contribute to a better understanding of the unique challenges of wartime CA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism and Media
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6040194
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affordances of Wartime Collective Action on Facebook

Alexander Ronzhyn, Albert Batlle Rubio, Ana Sofía Cardenal
Journalism and Media
Social Media and Politics
article

Affordances of Wartime Collective Action on Facebook

Alexander Ronzhyn, Albert Batlle Rubio, Ana Sofía Cardenal
article en

Abstract

This paper relies on the conceptual framework of affordances to study collective action, focusing on the under-researched area of wartime collective efforts. Using the case study of collective action during the war in Ukraine, the paper analyses a sample of the most successful Facebook profiles engaging in collective action to support the military and humanitarian efforts in Ukraine and uncovers the various approaches to the organisation of collective action. The paper explores the common features and differences between activists, including approaches to presentation, user engagement, interaction, and reporting. Two groups of profiles are identified based on how they actualise Facebook affordances: organisational and individual profiles. The two groups were found to clearly differ in their approach to user engagement, posting patterns and the use of specific Facebook functions. The findings have implications regarding the organisation of collective initiatives by different actors and contribute to a better understanding of the unique challenges of wartime CA.

Journalism and MediaVol. 6(4)
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.