A letter to a young data analyst: learning before leaning on AI

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping research, from coding to data analysis and manuscript preparation. For early-career researchers, these tools promise efficiency and accessibility but also pose risks when adopted before foundational skills are established. New learners benefit from first building competence without AI; developing the judgment, intuition, and problem-solving skills that come from grappling directly with data and analyses. Early overreliance can obscure critical details, foster errors, and encourage cognitive offloading, reducing the ability to troubleshoot independently. These risks are most acute for students and early-career analysts, who use AI more frequently than their senior counterparts. Rather than discouraging AI, I advocate for a staged approach: build strong technical foundations first, then use AI to accelerate and expand research. Doing so maximizes the benefits of AI while safeguarding rigor. In a time of growing expectations for productivity, quality over quantity remains the benchmark for advancing science and informing conservation decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mammalogy
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaf082
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A letter to a young data analyst: learning before leaning on AI

Marissa A. Dyck
Journal of Mammalogy
Research Data Management Practices
article

A letter to a young data analyst: learning before leaning on AI

Marissa A. Dyck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping research, from coding to data analysis and manuscript preparation. For early-career researchers, these tools promise efficiency and accessibility but also pose risks when adopted before foundational skills are established. New learners benefit from first building competence without AI; developing the judgment, intuition, and problem-solving skills that come from grappling directly with data and analyses. Early overreliance can obscure critical details, foster errors, and encourage cognitive offloading, reducing the ability to troubleshoot independently. These risks are most acute for students and early-career analysts, who use AI more frequently than their senior counterparts. Rather than discouraging AI, I advocate for a staged approach: build strong technical foundations first, then use AI to accelerate and expand research. Doing so maximizes the benefits of AI while safeguarding rigor. In a time of growing expectations for productivity, quality over quantity remains the benchmark for advancing science and informing conservation decisions.

Journal of MammalogyVol. 107(1)
University of Victoria (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.