What makes listening comprehension difficult?: A feature-based machine learning approach to understanding item difficulty
Abstract Understanding what makes second language (L2) listening comprehension difficult is crucial for advancing language learning and assessment. In L2 listening assessment, a key challenge is developing items with targeted difficulty levels. This difficulty can be influenced by textual and acoustic features from different item segments (i.e. stimuli, stems, and options) embedded in a multi-layered structure, along with task-related features. This study explores a feature-based machine learning (ML) approach to predicting difficulty of multiple-choice listening items on a local language proficiency test. We extracted construct-relevant textual and acoustic features from item segments across five dimensions: lexical complexity, syntactic complexity, fluency, pronunciation, and similarities among item segments. Incorporating these features, we compared traditional and mixed-effects ML models for predictive accuracy and interpretability. The best-performing model—a mixed-effects Ridge model with twenty-three features—achieved high accuracy (R2 = 0.860) and showed meaningful feature-difficulty relationships. This study presents methodological innovations for item difficulty modeling and offers practical implications for human- and machine-mediated item development. It also demonstrates potential of incorporating computational linguistics and ML in enhancing L2 listening assessment.
Authors
- Huiying Cai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5110-4553)
- Xun Yan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4544-4938)
- Ping-Lin Chuang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-5324)
- Mingyue Huo
- Yulin Pan
Institutions
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Penn Center for AIDS Research (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Applied Linguistics
- Published
- 2025-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf079
- Primary Topic
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00